Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;110:121-127
© 2007 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menzies, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menzies, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology/public health
Right arrow Hypertension and PIH
Right arrow Maternal/fetal physiology
Right arrow Medical complications of pregnancy
Right arrow Pediatrics/neonatology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Instituting Surveillance Guidelines and Adverse Outcomes in Preeclampsia

Jennifer Menzies, BSc1,5, Laura A. Magee, MD, FRCPC1,2,3,4, Jing Li, MSS4, Ying C. MacNab, PhD2,4, Ruihua Yin, MSc5, Heather Stuart, BSc1, Brandon Baraty, BSc1, Elaine Lam, BSc1, Trevor Hamilton, BSc6, Shoo K. Lee, MBBS, PhD7, Peter von Dadelszen, MBChB, DPhil for the Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk (PIERS) Study Group*

From the Departments of 1Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2Health Care and Epidemiology, and 3Medicine, and the 4CFRI Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; 5Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 6Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; and 7Department of Paediatrics and iCARE, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of combined adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia before and after introducing standardized assessment and surveillance.

METHODS: This study was a preintervention (retrospective) compared with a postintervention (prospective) cohort comparison in a single-tertiary, perinatal unit that included women admitted to hospital with preeclampsia. We interrogated an existing retrospective 24-month database and then introduced the guidelines, assessing the incidence of the combined adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes for 41 months (September 2003 through February 2007). Tests of organ (dys)function were performed at least as often as on the day of admission, admission day +1, every Monday and Thursday, day of delivery, and delivery day +1. All data were checked for errors. The combined maternal outcome was maternal death or one or more of hepatic failure, hematoma, or rupture, Glasgow coma score of less than 13, stroke, at least two seizures, cortical blindness, need for positive inotrope support, myocardial infarction, infusion of any third antihypertensive, renal dialysis, renal transplantation, at least 50% FIO2 for greater than 1 hour, intubation, or transfusion of at least 10 units of blood products. The combined perinatal outcome was perinatal or infant mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, grade III/IV intraventricular hemorrhage, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, or stage 3–5 retinopathy of prematurity.

RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-five and 405 women were in the preintervention and postintervention cohorts, respectively. The incidence of adverse maternal outcome fell (5.1% to 0.7%; Fisher P<.001; odds ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.04–0.49). Perinatal outcomes did not change.

CONCLUSION: Standardized surveillance of women with preeclampsia was associated with reduced maternal risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.