Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;109:303-308
© 2007 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Altman, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Altman, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Gynecologic surgery
Right arrow Urogynecology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Perioperative Morbidity Using Transvaginal Mesh in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Daniel Altman, MD, PhD, Christian Falconer, MD, PhD for the Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group*

From the Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the perioperative morbidity associated with transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS: During a 6-month time period, 25 centers registered all surgical procedures using a commercially available mesh. The frequency and type of perioperative complications, during surgery and the associated hospital stay, were documented using a standardized protocol.

RESULTS: During the inclusion period, 248 women underwent transvaginal mesh surgery: anterior repair in 106 patients (43%), posterior repair in 71 (29%), combined anterior and posterior repair in 20 (8%), and total repair in 51 (21%). Mean age was 67.8 years (±10.3 standard deviation) and median parity was 2 (range 0–6). Surgery for prolapse recurrence was performed in 56% of the patients (n=140), and 91% (n=225) had undergone at least one previous pelvic floor surgical procedure. Serious complications occurred in 4.4% of patients (n=11) and were dominated by visceral injury (10 of 11 cases). One case of bleeding in excess of 1,000 mL occurred. Minor complications occurred in 14.5% of patients (n=36), and the majority were urinary tract infections, urinary retention, and postoperative fever. A multivariable risk analysis showed that concurrent pelvic floor surgery was associated with an increased risk for minor complications, odds ratio 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.1–6.9). There were no other predictors of outcomes when assessing the association with age, parity, weight, previous pelvic floor surgery, previous hysterectomy, or concurrent hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION: Perioperative serious complications are uncommon after transvaginal mesh procedures although particular care should be taken to detect visceral injury at the time of surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. H. Boyles and R. McCrery
Dyspareunia and Mesh Erosion After Vaginal Mesh Placement With a Kit Procedure
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2008; 111(4): 969 - 975.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
N. Gangam and A. Kanee
Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage After a Vaginal Mesh Prolapse Procedure
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2007; 110(2): 463 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.