Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;109:270-276
© 2007 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v109,p1207)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kennare, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kennare, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology/public health
Right arrow Labor and operative obstetrics
Right arrow Obstetric complications of pregnancy
Right arrow Pediatrics/neonatology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Risks of Adverse Outcomes in the Next Birth After a First Cesarean Delivery

Robyn Kennare, Grad Dip PH1, Graeme Tucker, BSc2, Adrian Heard, MPH2 and Annabelle Chan, FAFPHM1

From the 1Pregnancy Outcome Unit and 2Health Statistics Unit, Epidemiology Branch, Department of Health, Adelaide, South Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risks of cesarean first birth, compared with vaginal first birth, for adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in the second birth.

METHODS: Population-based retrospective cohort study of all singleton, second births in the South Australian perinatal data collection 1998 to 2003 comparing outcomes for 8,725 women who underwent a cesarean delivery for their first birth with 27,313 women who underwent a vaginal first birth. Predictor variables include age, indigenous status, smoking, pregnancy interval, medical and obstetric complications, gestation, patient type, hospital category, and history of ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth or termination of pregnancy.

RESULTS: The cesarean delivery cohort had increased risks for malpresentation (odds ratio [OR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65–2.06), placenta previa (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.30–2.11), antepartum hemorrhage (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08–1.41), placenta accreta (OR 18.79, 95% CI 2.28–864.6), prolonged labor (OR 5.89, 95% CI 3.91–8.89), emergency cesarean (relative risk 9.37, 95% CI 8.98–9.76) and uterine rupture (OR 84.42, 95% CI 14.64-infinity), preterm birth (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04–1.31), low birth weight (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14–1.48), small for gestational age (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02–1.23), stillbirth (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04–2.32), and unexplained stillbirth (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.26–4.37). The range of the number of primary cesarean deliveries needed to harm included 134 for one additional preterm birth, up to 1,536 for one additional placenta accreta.

CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery is associated with increased risks for adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in the subsequent birth. However, some risks may be due to confounding factors related to the indication for the first cesarean.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. K. Daltveit, M. C. Tollanes, H. Pihlstrom, and L. M. Irgens
Cesarean Delivery and Subsequent Pregnancies
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2008; 111(6): 1327 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
T. Schmitz, C. d. C. Carnavalet, E. Azria, E. Lopez, D. Cabrol, and F. Goffinet
Neonatal Outcomes of Twin Pregnancy According to the Planned Mode of Delivery
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2008; 111(3): 695 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.