Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;108:1477-1485
© 2006 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crofts, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Draycott, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crofts, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Draycott, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Labor and operative obstetrics
Right arrow Medical education
Right arrow Obstetric complications of pregnancy

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Training for Shoulder Dystocia

A Trial of Simulation Using Low-Fidelity and High-Fidelity Mannequins

Joanna F. Crofts, BMBS1, Christine Bartlett, RM1, Denise Ellis, RM1, Linda P. Hunt, PhD2, Robert Fox, MB3 and Timothy J. Draycott, MD1

From the 1Simulation and Fire-drill Evaluation (SaFE) Study, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Bristol National Health Service Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom; 2University Department of Clinical Sciences at South Bristol, Institute of Child Life and Health, University of Bristol Healthcare Trust Education Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom; 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Taunton and Somerset National Health Service Trust, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation training for shoulder dystocia management and compare training using a high-fidelity mannequin with that using traditional devices.

METHODS: Training was undertaken in six hospitals and a medical simulation center in the United Kingdom. Midwives and obstetricians working for participating hospitals were eligible for inclusion. One hundred forty participants (45 doctors, 95 midwives) were randomized to training with a high-fidelity training mannequin (incorporating force perception training) or traditional low-fidelity mannequins. Performance was assessed pre- and posttraining, using a videoed, standardized shoulder dystocia simulation. Outcome measures were delivery, head-to-body delivery time, use of appropriate and inappropriate actions, force applied, and communication.

RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two participants completed the posttraining assessment. All training was associated with improved performance: use of basic maneuvers 114 of 140 (81.4%) to 125 of 132 (94.7%) (P=.002), successful deliveries 60 of 140 (42.9%) to 110 of 132 (83.3%) (P<.001), good communication with the patient 79 of 139 (56.8%) to 109 of 132 (82.6%) (P<.001), pre- and posttraining, respectively. Training with the high-fidelity mannequin was associated with a higher successful delivery rate than training with traditional devices: 94% compared with 72% (odds ratio 6.53, 95% confidence interval 2.05–20.81; P=.002). Total applied force was significantly lower for those who had undergone force training (2,030 Newton seconds versus 2,916 Newton seconds; P=.006) but there was no significant difference in the peak applied force 102 Newtons versus 112 Newtons (P=.242).

CONCLUSION: This study verifies the need for shoulder dystocia training; before training only 43% participants could achieve delivery. All training with mannequins improved the management of simulated shoulder dystocia. Training on a high-fidelity mannequin, including force perception teaching, offered additional training benefits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. F. Crofts, R. Fox, D. Ellis, C. Winter, K. Hinshaw, and T. J. Draycott
Observations From 450 Shoulder Dystocia Simulations: Lessons for Skills Training
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2008; 112(4): 906 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
T. J. Draycott, J. F. Crofts, J. P. Ash, L. V. Wilson, E. Yard, T. Sibanda, and A. Whitelaw
Improving Neonatal Outcome Through Practical Shoulder Dystocia Training
Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2008; 112(1): 14 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RiskHome page
T. Draycott, C. Sanders, J. Crofts, and J. Lloyd
A template for reviewing the strength of evidence for obstetric brachial plexus injury in clinical negligence claims
Clin Risk, May 1, 2008; 14(3): 96 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. Ellis, J. F. Crofts, L. P. Hunt, M. Read, R. Fox, and M. James
Hospital, Simulation Center, and Teamwork Training for Eclampsia Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2008; 111(3): 723 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
J F Crofts, C Bartlett, D Ellis, C Winter, F Donald, L P Hunt, and T J Draycott
Patient-actor perception of care: a comparison of obstetric emergency training using manikins and patient-actors
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 20 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. F. Crofts, C. Bartlett, D. Ellis, L. P. Hunt, R. Fox, and T. J. Draycott
Management of Shoulder Dystocia: Skill Retention 6 and 12 Months After Training
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2007; 110(5): 1069 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.