Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;108:1369-1374
© 2006 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Case, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Huh, W. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Case, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Huh, W. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cytology/colposcopy
Right arrow Epidemiology/public health
Right arrow General gynecology
Right arrow Gynecologic oncology
Right arrow Pathology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Adolescent Women

Incidence and Treatment Outcomes

Ashley S. Case, MD1, Rodney P. Rocconi, MD1, J. Michael Straughn, Jr, MD1, Wenquan Wang, PhD2, Kimberly Roark1, Erin E. Waltman1 and Warner K. Huh, MD1

From the 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology; and the 2Department of Medicine, Medical Statistics Section, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and treatment outcomes in adolescents with abnormal cytology.

METHODS: Adolescent women (ages 14–21 years) referred to colposcopy clinic for abnormal cytology from 1992 to 2004 were identified by computerized database. Only adolescents with biopsy-proven CIN were evaluated. Demographic and risk factor data were obtained from medical records. Referral cytology, histology on biopsy and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP), and follow-up cytology were analyzed and compared. Statistical analysis was performed by {chi}2 or Fisher exact test, Student t tests, and logistic regression.

RESULTS: Of 1,678 adolescents, 517 had biopsy-proven CIN and follow-up. Seventy-seven patients were referred with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) cytology; 174 patients were referred with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), 258 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and eight with atypical glandular cells (AGC). The rate of CIN 2/3 in patients with ASCUS, LSIL, and HSIL was 35% (95% confidence interval 24–46%), 36% (29–43%), and 50% (44–56%), respectively. A total of 192 patients with biopsy-proven CIN 2/3 underwent a LEEP. No patients were diagnosed with cervical carcinoma. Fifty-five percent (95% confidence interval 48–62%) of patients had abnormal cytology on follow-up, suggesting recurrence or reinfection.

CONCLUSION: Adolescents with abnormal cytology have a high incidence of CIN2/3 and high rates of abnormal cytology after LEEP. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 is common in adolescents with abnormal cytology, yet no cases of cancer were identified. Importantly, LEEP fails to meet its therapeutic goals given a high incidence of abnormal follow-up cytology and may represent overly aggressive therapy because the majority of human papillomavirus infections are transient with high regression rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
S Crowther, L Turner, D Magee, and D Gibbons
Role of age stratification for colposcopy referral following initial diagnosis of mild dyskaryosis
J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2008; 61(5): 665 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.