Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;108:990-1003
© 2006 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Quiz
Right arrow CME Quiz Answers
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, H. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow General gynecology

CLINICAL EXPERT SERIES

Assessment of New Technology in the Treatment of Idiopathic Menorrhagia and Uterine Leiomyomata

Howard T. Sharp, MD

From the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.

New technologies available for the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia include five global endometrial ablation devices that use differing ablative methods, including thermal balloon, circulated hot fluid, cryotherapy, radiofrequency electrosurgery, and microwave energy. All have been compared with rollerball endometrial ablation by way of randomized clinical trials and are associated with high patient satisfaction rates, regardless of method, but a wide range of amenorrhea rates (13.9–55.3%). They are associated with low complication rates when performed by well-trained physicians following protocols in Food and Drug Administration trials. Some serious complications have been reported subsequently. Strict adherence to patient selection criteria and manufacturer protocols is strongly recommended.

New technologies for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata include uterine artery embolization, magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasonography, laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion, and cryomyolysis. There is sound evidence for shorter hospital stay, quicker return to work, and a similar major complication rate compared with hysterectomy. Uterine artery embolization appears to be effective for up to 5 years in reducing bulk symptoms and menorrhagia associated with leiomyomata. The chance of reoperation for leiomyoma-related symptoms within 5 years is 20–29%. Women who wish to become pregnant should be cautioned about potential complications during pregnancy. There is insufficient evidence to recommend uterine artery embolization in postmenopausal women. With regard to magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasonography, cryomyolysis, and laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion, although the initial symptom reduction outcomes have been reported as favorable, more data are needed to better understand the durability of these results.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.