Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;108:549-555
© 2006 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baskett, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allen, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baskett, T. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology/public health
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Labor and operative obstetrics

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Cumulative Economic Implications of Initial Method of Delivery

Victoria M. Allen, MD, MSc1, Colleen M. O’Connell, PhD2 and Thomas F. Baskett, MB1

From the 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2Perinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cumulative costs of hospital care in the first and subsequent pregnancies associated with different methods in the initial delivery of nulliparous women.

METHODS: An 18-year population-based cohort study (1985–2002) using the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database compared cumulative delivery costs in the first and subsequent pregnancies. Women were identified by initial method of delivery for nulliparous women with singleton cephalic presentation at term undergoing spontaneous or induced labor for planned vaginal delivery, and for nulliparous women undergoing cesarean delivery without labor. Costs that were assessed included nursing hours in antepartum, labor and delivery, postpartum and neonatal intensive care units, physician costs, labor induction agents, consumables, and costs for postpartum hysterectomy, tubal ligation, and dilatation and curettage.

RESULTS: A total of 27,613 pregnancies satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria. When cumulative costs by type of labor at first delivery were considered, induction of labor ($7,220) was more costly than spontaneous onset of labor ($6,919, P=.006). The cumulative costs of assisted vaginal delivery at first delivery ($7,288) and cesarean delivery in labor at first delivery ($9,524) were similar in magnitude and were higher than spontaneous vaginal delivery at first delivery (P<.001). Cesarean delivery in labor in the first delivery was the most costly type of delivery ($9,524), and the differences in cost increased with increasing number of deliveries (P<.05).

CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery in labor in the first delivery is associated with increased cumulative costs compared with other methods of delivery, regardless of the number or type of subsequent deliveries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
A. B. Caughey
Preventive Induction of Labor: Potential Benefits if Proved Effective
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2007; 5(4): 292 - 293.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.