Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;108:488-491
© 2006 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atkins, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gross, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atkins, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gross, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Infectious disease

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction for Group B Streptococcus Detection Using an Improved Culture Method

Kristin L. Atkins, MD1, Robyn M. Atkinson, PhD2,, Anthony Shanks, MD1, Curtis A. Parvin, PhD2, W. Michael Dunne, PhD2 and Gilad Gross, MD1

From the Departments of 1Obstetrics & Gynecology and 2Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri.

OBJECTIVE: The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis to laboring women who harbor Group B streptococci (GBS) depends on identification of carriers. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of GBS using a more stringent culture method.

METHODS: Two swabs were used simultaneously to obtain rectovaginal GBS samples from consenting women. One swab was analyzed using a stringent, validated culture technology, which included direct plating onto selective agar and inoculation of a selective broth. The other swab was used for a commercial real-time PCR assay, which uses amplification to detect the presence of the cfb gene sequence of GBS DNA. We calculated the assay accuracy using sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS: A total of 233 samples were available. Both the culture and PCR methods were positive for 59 and negative for 157 patients. The culture method was positive and PCR was negative in 9 patients. The culture was negative and the PCR positive for 8 patients. The sensitivity of the PCR assay was 86.8% and specificity was 95.2%. The positive predictive value was 88.1% and the negative predictive value was 94.6%.

CONCLUSION: Although a rapid PCR assay may be useful to determine GBS status in the urgent intrapartum setting, the false-negative rate of 13.2% for the real-time PCR assay prohibits its use for standard GBS screening in the office.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-1






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.