HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lavender, T. Articles by Walkinshaw, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lavender, T. Articles by Walkinshaw, S. Related Collections General obstetrics Labor and operative obstetrics

Effect of Different Partogram Action Lines on Birth Outcomes

A Randomized Controlled Trial

From the University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: The World Health Organization recommends partograms with a 4-hour action line, denoting the timing of intervention for prolonged labor; others recommend earlier intervention. We assessed the effect of different action line positioning on birth outcomes.

METHODS: A randomized trial of primigravid women with uncomplicated pregnancies, in spontaneous labor at term, was conducted in the northwest of England. Women were assigned to have their labors recorded on a partogram with an action line 2 or 4 hours to the right of the alert line. If progress crossed the action line, diagnosis of prolonged labor was made and managed according to standard protocol. Primary outcomes were rate of cesarean delivery and maternal satisfaction.

RESULTS: A total of 3,000 women were randomly assigned to groups; 2,975 (99.2%) were available for analysis. Questionnaires were completed by 1,929 (65%) women. There were no differences in cesarean delivery rate (136/1,490 compared with 135/1,485; relative risk [RR] 1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80–1.26) or women dissatisfied with labor experience (72/962 compared with 81/967; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66–1.21). More women assigned to the 2-hour arm had labors that crossed the action line (854/1,490 compared with 673/1,485; RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.18–1.37); received more intervention (772/1,490 compared with 624/1,485; RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.14–1.33); and, if admitted to the midwife-led unit, were transferred for consultant-led care (366/674 compared with 285/666; RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13–1.42).

CONCLUSION: In this birth setting, for primigravid women selecting low intervention care, the 2-hour partogram increases the need for intervention without improving maternal or neonatal outcomes, compared with the 4-hour partogram, advocated by the World Health Organization.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/|/0/78346801.html, ISRCTN78346801.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Fotinos Use of a 2 hour partogram action line instead of a 4 hour action line did not reduce caesarean delivery rate Evid. Based Med., April 1, 2007; 12(2): 46 - 46. [Full Text] [PDF]