Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;107:1303-1309
© 2006 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Barbour, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kahn, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Barbour, L. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes
Right arrow Medical complications of pregnancy

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Predictors of Glyburide Failure in the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes

Bronwen F. Kahn, MD1, Jill K. Davies, MD1, Anne M. Lynch, MD, MSPH2,3, Regina M. Reynolds, MD4 and Linda A. Barbour, MD, MSPH1,5

From the 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Basic Reproductive Science; 3Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics; 4Department of Pediatrics; and 5Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Colorado Health at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver Colorado.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) the patient characteristics that predict treatment failure with glyburide.

METHODS: Historical cohort of 95 GDM women offered glyburide after dietary failure with defined entry criteria.

RESULTS: From November 2000 to May 2005, 118 women had 124 pregnancies and were offered glyburide therapy by the 2 codirectors of our Diabetes Clinic. All but 2 women elected glyburide, and 27 pregnancies were excluded due to criteria defined a priori to the study. A cohort of 95 women with 95 pregnancies were included for analysis. Nineteen percent failed glyburide. Significant predictors of failure were maternal age (34 years compared with 29 years, P = .001), earlier diagnosis of GDM (23 weeks compared with 28 weeks, P = .002), higher gravidity (P = .01) and parity (P = .03), and a higher mean fasting blood glucose (112 compared with 100 mg/dL; P = .045) compared with those successfully treated. After adjustment in the multivariable logistic regression analysis, GDM women diagnosed at a gestational age less than 25 weeks were 8.3 times more likely to fail glyburide compared with those diagnosed after 25 weeks. Maternal and fetal outcomes were favorable with a cesarean delivery rate of 25% and macrosomia rate of 7%.

CONCLUSION: Glyburide was more likely to fail in women diagnosed earlier in pregnancy, of older age and multiparity, and with higher fasting glucoses, suggesting that earlier glucose intolerance and a reduced capacity to respond to an insulin secretagogue may distinguish this group. The time for glyburide as an alternative treatment has come; however, it should be prescribed after careful consideration of these patient characteristics to minimize the likelihood of failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
D. S Feig, G. G Briggs, and G. Koren
Oral Antidiabetic Agents in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Paradigm Shift?
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2007; 41(7): 1174 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. D. Lindheimer, A. Khurana, N. Vinayek, C. A. Stratakis, A. Klibanski, and M. F. Greene
Case 36-2006: A Pregnant Woman with New Hypertension
N. Engl. J. Med., March 1, 2007; 356(9): 966 - 968.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.