HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lukacz, E. S. Articles by Luber, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lukacz, E. S. Articles by Luber, K. M. Related Collections Epidemiology/public health Labor and operative obstetrics Urogynecology

Parity, Mode of Delivery, and Pelvic Floor Disorders

From the ¹University of California, San Diego, California; ²Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California; and ³San Diego Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, California.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the associations between parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders.

METHODS: The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and anal incontinence was assessed in a random sample of women aged 25–84 years by using the validated Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire. Women were categorized as nulliparous, vaginally parous, or only delivered by cesarean. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each disorder were calculated with logistic regression, controlling for age, body mass index, and parity.

RESULTS: In the 4,458 respondents the prevalence of each disorder was as follows: 7% prolapse, 15% stress urinary incontinence, 13% overactive bladder, 25% anal incontinence, and 37% for any one or more pelvic floor disorders. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of disorders between the cesarean delivery and nulliparous groups. The adjusted odds of each disorder increased with vaginal parity compared with cesarean delivery: prolapse = 1.82 (95% CI 1.04–3.19), stress urinary incontinence = 1.81 (95% CI 1.25–2.61), overactive bladder = 1.53 (95% CI 1.02–2.29), anal incontinence = 1.72 (95% CI 1.27–2.35), and any one or more pelvic floor disorders = 1.85 (95% CI 1.42–2.41). Number-needed-to-treat analysis revealed that 7 women would have to deliver only by cesarean delivery to prevent one woman from having a pelvic floor disorder.

CONCLUSION: The risk of pelvic floor disorders is independently associated with vaginal delivery but not with parity alone. Cesarean delivery has a protective effect, similar to nulliparity, on the development of pelvic floor disorders when compared with vaginal delivery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Lawrence, E. S. Lukacz, C. W. Nager, J.-W. Y. Hsu, and K. M. Luber Prevalence and Co-Occurrence of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Community-Dwelling Women Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2008; 111(3): 678 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Lawrence, E. S. Lukacz, I.-L. A. Liu, C. W. Nager, and K. M. Luber Pelvic Floor Disorders, Diabetes, and Obesity in Women: Findings from the Kaiser Permanente Continence Associated Risk Epidemiology Study Diabetes Care, October 1, 2007; 30(10): 2536 - 3541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. O. L. DeLancey, J. M. Miller, R. Kearney, D. Howard, P. Reddy, W. Umek, K. E. Guire, R. U. Margulies, and J. A. Ashton-Miller Vaginal Birth and De Novo Stress Incontinence: Relative Contributions of Urethral Dysfunction and Mobility Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2007; 110(2): 354 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]