Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;107:977-983
© 2006 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skupski, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Eglinton, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skupski, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Eglinton, G. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Labor and operative obstetrics
Right arrow Obstetric complications of pregnancy
Right arrow Placenta

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Improving Hospital Systems for the Care of Women With Major Obstetric Hemorrhage

Daniel W. Skupski, MD1, Isaac P. Lowenwirt, MD1, Fredric I. Weinbaum, MD1, Dana Brodsky, MPH, CNM1, Margaret Danek, RN1 and Gary S. Eglinton, MD1

From the 1 Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anesthesiology, and Quality Management, New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens, Flushing, New York.

OBJECTIVE: When 2 maternal deaths due to hemorrhage occurred at New York Hospital Queens in 2000–2001, a multidisciplinary team implemented systemic change. Our objective was to improve outcomes of episodes of major obstetric hemorrhage.

METHODS: We report outcomes before (2000–2001) and after (2002–2005) the introduction of a patient safety program aimed at improving the care of women with major obstetric hemorrhage. Process changes were instituted in late 2001 at the direction of a multidisciplinary patient safety team. A rapid response team was formulated using the cardiac arrest team as a model. Protocols for early diagnosis, assessment, and management of patients at high risk for major obstetric hemorrhage were developed and communicated to staff.

RESULTS: There were significant increases in cesarean births (P < .001), repeat cesarean births (P = .002), and cases of major obstetric hemorrhage (P = .02) between the periods of 2000–2001 and 2002–2005. There was a significant improvement in mortality due to hemorrhage (P = .036), lowest pH (P = .004), and lowest temperature (P < .001) when comparing 2000–2001 with 2002–2005. There were no differences in measures of severity of obstetric hemorrhage between the 2 periods, including Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, occurrence of placenta accreta and estimated blood loss.

CONCLUSION: Despite a significant increase in major obstetric hemorrhage cases, we found improved outcomes and fewer maternal deaths after implementing systemic approaches to improve patient safety. Attention to improving the hospital systems necessary for the care of women at risk for major obstetric hemorrhage is important in the effort to decrease maternal mortality from hemorrhage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. M. O'Brien
Placenta Previa, Placenta Accreta, and Vasa Previa
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2007; 109(1): 203 - 204.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.