|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the 1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey; 2Department of Epidemiology, UMDNJ-School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey; and 3School of Medicine and 4School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether small for gestational age is a risk factor for stillbirth of a subsequent sibling.
METHODS: The Missouri maternally linked cohort data set, containing data on births from 1978 through 1997, was used. We identified the study group (women who delivered a SGA infant in the first pregnancy) and a comparison group (women who delivered a non-SGA infant in their first pregnancy) and compared the outcome (stillbirth) in the second pregnancy between both groups.
RESULTS: We analyzed information on the first and second pregnancies of 402,015 women (43,549 [10.8%] in the study arm and 358,466 [89.2%] in the comparison arm). Of the 1,883 cases of stillbirth in the second pregnancy, 314 cases occurred in mothers with a history of SGA (stillbirth rate 7.2/1,000) and 1,569 in the comparison group (stillbirth rate 4.4/1,000), P < .001. The adjusted risk of stillbirth was 60% higher in women with a prior SGA (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41.8). The risk for stillbirth in the second pregnancy increased with decreasing gestational age at birth of the SGA infant in the first pregnancy (term: OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.21.6; preterm: OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.03.8; and very preterm: OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.47.3), P for trend < .001.
CONCLUSION: Small for gestational age is a marker for subsequent stillbirth, and the risk rises with decreasing gestational age of the SGA birth. This information is potentially useful for counseling parents of SGA infants.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. M. Salihu, A. K. Mbah, A. P. Alio, and R. S. Kirby AGA-Primed Uteri Compared With SGA-Primed Uteri and the Success of Subsequent In Utero Fetal Programming Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2008; 111(4): 935 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Hutcheon and R. W. Platt The Missing Data Problem in Birth Weight Percentiles and Thresholds for "Small-for-Gestational-Age" Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 167(7): 786 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |