Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;107:851-856
© 2006 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salihu, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smulian, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salihu, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smulian, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology/public health

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Is Small for Gestational Age a Marker of Future Fetal Survival In Utero?

Hamisu M. Salihu, MD, PhD1, Puza P. Sharma, MD, MPH2, Muktar H. Aliyu, MD, DrPH3, Sibylle Kristensen, MPH3, Jaqui Grimes-Dennis, MD, MPH1, Russell S. Kirby, PhD4 and John Smulian, MD, MPH1

From the 1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey; 2Department of Epidemiology, UMDNJ-School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey; and 3School of Medicine and 4School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether small for gestational age is a risk factor for stillbirth of a subsequent sibling.

METHODS: The Missouri maternally linked cohort data set, containing data on births from 1978 through 1997, was used. We identified the study group (women who delivered a SGA infant in the first pregnancy) and a comparison group (women who delivered a non-SGA infant in their first pregnancy) and compared the outcome (stillbirth) in the second pregnancy between both groups.

RESULTS: We analyzed information on the first and second pregnancies of 402,015 women (43,549 [10.8%] in the study arm and 358,466 [89.2%] in the comparison arm). Of the 1,883 cases of stillbirth in the second pregnancy, 314 cases occurred in mothers with a history of SGA (stillbirth rate 7.2/1,000) and 1,569 in the comparison group (stillbirth rate 4.4/1,000), P < .001. The adjusted risk of stillbirth was 60% higher in women with a prior SGA (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–1.8). The risk for stillbirth in the second pregnancy increased with decreasing gestational age at birth of the SGA infant in the first pregnancy (term: OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–1.6; preterm: OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.0–3.8; and very preterm: OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.4–7.3), P for trend < .001.

CONCLUSION: Small for gestational age is a marker for subsequent stillbirth, and the risk rises with decreasing gestational age of the SGA birth. This information is potentially useful for counseling parents of SGA infants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
H. M. Salihu, A. K. Mbah, A. P. Alio, and R. S. Kirby
AGA-Primed Uteri Compared With SGA-Primed Uteri and the Success of Subsequent In Utero Fetal Programming
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2008; 111(4): 935 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. A. Hutcheon and R. W. Platt
The Missing Data Problem in Birth Weight Percentiles and Thresholds for "Small-for-Gestational-Age"
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 167(7): 786 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.