|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the 1 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and 2 Division of MaternalFetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between cesarean delivery and previa and abruption in subsequent pregnancies.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of first 2 (n = 156,475) and first 3 (n = 31,102) consecutive singleton pregnancies using the 19891997 Missouri longitudinally linked data were performed. Relative risk (RR) was used to quantify the associations between cesarean delivery and risks of previa and abruption in subsequent pregnancies, after adjusting for several confounders.
RESULTS: Rates of previa and abruption were 4.4 (n = 694) and 7.9 (n = 1,243) per 1,000 births, respectively. The pregnancy after a cesarean delivery was associated with increased risk of previa (0.63%) compared with a vaginal delivery (0.38%, RR 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31.8). Cesarean delivery in the first and second births conferred a two-fold increased risk of previa in the third pregnancy (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.33.0) compared with first two vaginal deliveries. Women with a cesarean first birth were more likely to have an abruption in the second pregnancy (0.95%) compared with women who had a vaginal first birth (0.74%, RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.21.5). Two consecutive cesarean deliveries were associated with a 30% increased risk of abruption in the third pregnancy (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.01.8). A second pregnancy within a year after a cesarean delivery was associated with increased risks of previa (RR 1.7, 95% CI 0.93.1) and abruption (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.12.3).
CONCLUSION: A cesarean first birth is associated with increased risks of previa and abruption in the second pregnancy. There is a doseresponse pattern in the risk of previa, with increasing number of prior cesarean deliveries. A short interpregnancy interval is associated with increased risks of previa and abruption.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Pasupathy and G. C S Smith Neonatal outcomes with caesarean delivery at term Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2008; 93(3): F174 - F175. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Grobman, R. Gersnoviez, M. B. Landon, C. Y. Spong, K. J. Leveno, D. J. Rouse, M. W. Varner, A. H. Moawad, S. N. Caritis, M. Harper, et al. Pregnancy Outcomes for Women With Placenta Previa in Relation to the Number of Prior Cesarean Deliveries Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2007; 110(6): 1249 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Luke and M. B. Brown Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1264 - 1272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Oyelese and C. V. Ananth Placental abruption. Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2006; 108(4): 1005 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Cesarean Delivery Increases Subsequent Risk for Previa and Abruption Journal Watch Women's Health, June 20, 2006; 2006(620): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Cesarean Delivery Increases Risk for Future Placenta Previa and Abruption Journal Watch (General), April 25, 2006; 2006(425): 7 - 7. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Resnik Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified? Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2006; 107(4): 752 - 754. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |