HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Joseph, K. S. Articles by Young, D. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Joseph, K. S. Articles by Young, D. C. Related Collections General obstetrics Labor and operative obstetrics Obstetric complications of pregnancy Epidemiology/public health

Socioeconomic Status and Receipt of Obstetric Services in Canada

From the Perinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Pediatrics, the Division of Maternal/Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia and the Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in labor induction and cesarean delivery rates by socioeconomic status in Nova Scotia, Canada.

METHODS: We studied all women in Nova Scotia who delivered between 1988 and 1995 after a singleton pregnancy. Information was obtained from the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database and the federal income tax (T1) Family Files maintained by the Small Area and Administrative Data Division of Statistics Canada (n = 76,440). Labor induction and cesarean delivery rates were contrasted by family income and other indices, with adjustment for risk factors carried out using logistic models.

RESULTS: Maternal characteristics and other factors varied by socioeconomic status; in the lowest income group 4.4% of women were aged 35 years or older, and 49.4% were nonsmokers, whereas in the highest income group 17.7% were aged 35 years or older, and 88.7% were nonsmokers. Crude induction rates were similar across income groups (17.7% compared with 18.1% in the lowest compared with highest income groups), but there were significant differences in crude cesarean (17.7% compared with 21.2%) and crude primary cesarean rates (12.5% compared with 17.0%). Controlling for differences in risk factors altered these relationships. Adjusted rate ratios, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P values contrasting the lowest compared with highest income groups were labor induction 1.09 (95% CI 1.00–1.19), P = .05; overall cesarean delivery 1.12 (95% CI 1.03–1.23), P = .01; primary cesarean delivery 1.09 (95% CI 0.98–1.21), P = .12.

CONCLUSION: Affluent women in Canada are not more likely to have labor induction or cesarean delivery compared with less affluent women.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K.S. Joseph MD PhD, R. M. Liston MB, L. Dodds PhD, L. Dahlgren MD, and A. C. Allen MD Socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in a setting with universal access to essential health care services Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 11, 2007; 177(6): 583 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]