Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;107:342-347
© 2006 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, T. E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Silver, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, T. E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Silver, R. K.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Universal Perinatal Depression Screening in an Academic Medical Center

Trent E. J. Gordon, MS1, Ida A. Cardone, PhD1,3, Jennifer J. Kim, PhD1, Scott M. Gordon, MD2 and Richard K. Silver, MD1

From Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, the Jennifer Mudd Houghtaling Postpartum Depression Program, Departments of 1Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2Psychiatry, and 3Pediatrics, Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston, Illinois.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a department-based program to identify and treat women at risk for perinatal depression.

METHODS: Private and employed physician groups were engaged to conduct antepartum maternal depression screening using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. A comprehensive program was established to ensure that patients identified as being at risk would receive appropriate care. The program 1) developed a network of existing community mental health providers to accommodate screen-positive referrals, 2) created a 24/7 hotline staffed by mental health workers to respond to urgent/emergent patient needs, 3) provided nursing and physician education via a comprehensive curriculum on perinatal depression, and 4) facilitated outpatient depression screening that included a centralized scoring and referral system.

RESULTS: A total of 4,322 women completed 4,558 screens during the initial 24 months (June 2003–May 2005). Although initial uptake of the screening program was gradual, all 20 departmental obstetric practices were screening their patients at the end of the first year. Depression screening was accomplished between 28–32 weeks of gestation, and postpartum screening (during the 6-week postpartum visit) was subsequently added. Overall, 11.1% of women screened positive in the antenatal period, and 7.3% screened positive in the postnatal period. Three hundred three women were referred for evaluation and care.

CONCLUSION: Department-based, perinatal depression screening was feasible when individual physician practices were not required to develop the infrastructure necessary to respond to at-risk patients. We believe that the provision of clinical safety nets (mental health provider network and the hotline) were essential to the universal acceptance of this program by practitioners.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
D. K. Gjerdingen and B. P. Yawn
Postpartum Depression Screening: Importance, Methods, Barriers, and Recommendations for Practice
J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2007; 20(3): 280 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.