HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aletti, G. D. Articles by Cliby, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Aletti, G. D. Articles by Cliby, W. A.

Aggressive Surgical Effort and Improved Survival in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

OBJECTIVE: Residual disease after initial surgery for ovarian cancer is the strongest prognostic factor for survival. However, the extent of surgical resection required to achieve optimal cytoreduction is controversial. Our goal was to estimate the effect of aggressive surgical resection on ovarian cancer patient survival.

METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC ovarian cancer undergoing primary surgery was conducted between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1998. The main outcome measures were residual disease after cytoreduction, frequency of radical surgical resection, and 5-year disease-specific survival.

RESULTS: The study comprised 194 patients, including 144 with carcinomatosis. The mean patient age and follow-up time were 64.4 and 3.5 years, respectively. After surgery, 131 (67.5%) of the 194 patients had less than 1 cm of residual disease (definition of optimal cytoreduction). Considering all patients, residual disease was the only independent predictor of survival; the need to perform radical procedures to achieve optimal cytoreduction was not associated with a decrease in survival. For the subgroup of patients with carcinomatosis, residual disease and the performance of radical surgical procedures were the only independent predictors. Disease-specific survival was markedly improved for patients with carcinomatosis operated on by surgeons who most frequently used radical procedures compared with those least likely to use radical procedures (44% versus 17%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION: Overall, residual disease was the only independent predictor of survival. Minimizing residual disease through aggressive surgical resection was beneficial, especially in patients with carcinomatosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Markman Concept of Optimal Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Brief Critique and a Call for Action J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2007; 25(27): 4168 - 4170. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Fader and P. G. Rose Role of Surgery in Ovarian Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2873 - 2883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. D. Aletti and W. A. Cliby Importance of Surgical Aggressiveness in Advanced Ovarian Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2006; 24(15): 2397 - 2397. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Crawford, J. Paul, S. B. Kaye, P. A. Vasey, J. A. Davis, and A. Hay In Reply: J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2006; 24(15): 2398 - 2399. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Aggressive Surgical "Debulking" Improves Survival in Ovarian Cancer Patients Journal Watch (General), February 3, 2006; 2006(203): 4 - 4. [Full Text]