Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006;107:6-10
© 2006 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kagan, K. O.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolaides, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kagan, K. O.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolaides, K. H.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Relation Between Increased Fetal Nuchal Translucency Thickness and Chromosomal Defects

Karl Oliver Kagan, MD1, Kyriaki Avgidou, MD1, Francisca S. Molina, MD1, Katarzyna Gajewska, MD1 and Kypros H. Nicolaides, MD1

From the 1Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King’s College Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence and distribution of all chromosomal defects in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency thickness.

METHODS: Assessment of risk for trisomy 21 was carried out by a combination of maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 11–13 + 6 weeks. A search of the database was made to identify, first, all singleton pregnancies in which fetal karyotyping was carried out and, second, the cases where the fetal nuchal translucency was equal to or above the 95th centile for fetal crown-rump length. The prevalence and distribution of chromosomal defects were determined for each nuchal translucency category: between the 95th centile for crown-rump length and 3.4 mm, 3.5–4.4 mm, 4.5–5.4 mm, 5.5–6.4 mm, 6.5–7.4 mm, 7.5–8.4 mm, 8.5–9.4 mm, 9.5–10.4 mm, 10.5–11.4 mm, and 11.5 mm or more.

RESULTS: The search identified 11,315 pregnancies. The median maternal age was 34.5 (range 15–50) years, and the median fetal crown-rump length was 64 (range 45–84) mm. The fetal karyotype was abnormal in 2,168 (19.2%) pregnancies, and the incidence of chromosomal defects increased with nuchal translucency thickness from approximately 7% for those with nuchal translucency between the 95th centile for crown-rump length and 3.4 mm to 75% for nuchal translucency of 8.5 mm or more. In the majority of fetuses with trisomy 21, the nuchal translucency thickness was less then 4.5 mm, whereas in the majority of fetuses with trisomies 13 or 18 it was 4.5–8.4 mm, and in those with Turner syndrome it was 8.5 mm or more.

CONCLUSION: In fetuses with increased nuchal translucency, approximately one half of the chromosomally abnormal group is affected by defects other than trisomy 21. The distribution of nuchal translucency is different for each type of chromosomal defect.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
F. M. Breathnach, F. D. Malone, G. Lambert-Messerlian, H. S. Cuckle, T. F. Porter, D. A. Nyberg, C. H. Comstock, G. R. Saade, R. L. Berkowitz, S. Klugman, et al.
First- and Second-Trimester Screening: Detection of Aneuploidies Other Than Down Syndrome
Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2007; 110(3): 651 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
C. Papp, A. Beke, G. Mezei, Z. Szigeti, Z. Ban, and Z. Papp
Prenatal Diagnosis of Turner Syndrome: Report on 69 Cases
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2006; 25(6): 711 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
F. S. Molina, K. Avgidou, K. O. Kagan, S. Poggi, and K. H. Nicolaides
Cystic hygromas, nuchal edema, and nuchal translucency at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2006; 107(3): 678 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
N. C. Rose
On the Current Dilemma of Down Syndrome Screening
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2006; 107(1): 2 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.