Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;106:919-926
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zaretsky, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Leveno, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zaretsky, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Leveno, K. J.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pelvimetry and the Prediction of Labor Dystocia

Michael V. Zaretsky, MD1, James M. Alexander, MD1, Donald D. McIntire, PhD1, Mustapha R. Hatab, PhD2, Diane M. Twickler, MD2 and Kenneth J. Leveno, MD2

From the Departments of 1Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pelvimetry has the ability to identify those women who require cesarean delivery for labor dystocia.

METHODS: From July 2003 to April 2004, nulliparous women scheduled for a labor induction for prolonged pregnancy (42 weeks) were asked to participate in a pelvimetry study. Those who consented underwent fast-acquisition MRI that included two 90-second acquisitions to evaluate fetal biometry and volumetry and maternal pelvimetry, including novel measurements of pelvic bony and soft tissue volumes as determined by MRI. Information about each patient’s pregnancy, labor course, and neonatal outcome was prospectively collected. Pelvimetry results for those women undergoing operative delivery for labor dystocia were compared with those who did not. Single fetal and maternal pelvic measurements, as well as ratios of both, were analyzed. In addition, previously described radiographic pelvimetry techniques and formulas to predict dystocia were used.

RESULTS: One hundred one women underwent MRI, and 22 of these underwent cesarean delivery for dystocia. No single fetal measurement was statistically associated with dystocia. Several maternal pelvic measures, fetal-to-maternal ratios, and previously reported pelvimetric techniques were significantly associated with dystocia. The ratio of magnetic resonance (MR) fetal head volume to pelvic soft tissue volume had statistical significance (P = .04). Receiver operator characteristic curves were developed for the different measurements, ratios, and formulas studied to assess whether any of the techniques could accurately predict labor dystocia requiring operative delivery. The area under the curve values ranged from 0.6 to 0.8, with the ratio of MR head volume to pelvic soft tissue being 0.7. These values suggest that MRI can identify those women at greatest risk for dystocia, but it cannot with accuracy predict which ones will require a cesarean.

CONCLUSION: We found significant associations with MRI pelvimetry and labor dystocia, but MRI was not a significant improvement over previously described pelvimetric techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
V. L. Handa, M. E. Lockhart, J. R. Fielding, C. S. Bradley, L. Brubaker, G. W. Cundiff, W. Ye, H. E. Richter, and for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2008; 111(4): 914 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. A. Pates, M. V. Zaretsky, J. M. Alexander, E. E. Babcock, D. D. McIntire, and D. M. Twickler
Determining Cervical Ripeness and Labor Outcome: The Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance T2 Relaxation Times
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2007; 109(2): 326 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. P. FitzGerald, A. M. Weber, N. Howden, G. W. Cundiff, M. B. Brown, and for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Risk Factors for Anal Sphincter Tear During Vaginal Delivery
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2007; 109(1): 29 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.