Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;106:908-912
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caughey, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Laros, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caughey, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Laros, R. K., Jr

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Forceps Compared With Vacuum

Rates of Neonatal and Maternal Morbidity

Aaron B. Caughey, MD, MPP, Per L. Sandberg, MD, Marya G. Zlatnik, MD, MMS, Mari-Paule Thiet, MD, Julian T. Parer, MD, PhD and Russell K. Laros, Jr, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal outcomes between forceps- and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Our hypothesis was that the force vectors achieved in forceps delivery will lead to fewer shoulder dystocias, but greater perineal lacerations.

METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 4,120 term, cephalic, singleton, nonrotational operative vaginal deliveries at a single institution. Outcomes examined included rates of neonatal trauma, shoulder dystocia, and perineal lacerations. Potential confounders, including maternal age, birthweight, ethnicity, parity, station at delivery, episiotomy, attending physician, anesthesia, and length of labor, were controlled for using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS: Among the 2,075 (50.4%) forceps- and 2,045 (49.6%) vacuum-assisted deliveries, the rate of shoulder dystocia was lower among women undergoing forceps delivery (1.5% compared with 3.5%, P < .001), as was the rate of cephalohematoma (4.5% compared with 14.8%, P < .001), whereas the rate of third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration was higher (36.9% compared with 26.8%, P < .001). These differences in perinatal complications persisted when controlling for the confounders listed above. The adjusted odds ratio for shoulder dystocia was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20–0.57), for cephalohematoma was 0.25 (95% CI 0.19–0.33), and for third- or fourth-degree lacerations was 1.79 (95% CI 1.52–2.10) when comparing forceps to vacuum.

CONCLUSION: Vacuum-assisted vaginal birth is more often associated with shoulder dystocia and cephalohematoma. Forceps delivery is more often associated with third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations. These differences in complications rates should be considered among other factors when determining the optimal mode of delivery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
N. Duggal, C. Mercado, K. Daniels, A. Bujor, A. B. Caughey, and Y. Y. El-Sayed
Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Prevention of Postpartum Perineal Wound Complications: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2008; 111(6): 1268 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. P. FitzGerald, A. M. Weber, N. Howden, G. W. Cundiff, M. B. Brown, and for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Risk Factors for Anal Sphincter Tear During Vaginal Delivery
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2007; 109(1): 29 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. B. Caughey, P. L. Sandberg, M. G. Zlatnik, M.-P. Thiet, J. T. Parer, and R. K. Laros Jr
Forceps Compared With Vacuum: Rates of Neonatal and Maternal Morbidity
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2006; 107(3): 740 - 740.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. P. Damron
Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2006; 107(3): 739 - 740.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. B. Caughey
Forceps Compared With Vacuum: Rates of Neonatal and Maternal Morbidity
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2006; 107(2): 427 - 427.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. Lurie, O. Sadan, and A. Golan
Forceps Compared With Vacuum: Rates of Neonatal and Maternal Morbidity
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2006; 107(2): 426 - 427.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Forceps Better Than Vacuum for Baby
Journal Watch Women's Health, December 27, 2005; 2005(1227): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.