Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;106:782-788
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abramov, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abramov, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, R. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Urogynecology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Effect of Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Blockade on Pain After Transvaginal Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

Yoram Abramov, MD1, Peter K. Sand, MD1, Sanjay Gandhi, MD1, Sylvia M. Botros, MD1, Jay-James R. Miller, MD1, Eun-Kyu Koh, MD2 and Roger P. Goldberg, MD, MPH1

1Division of Urogynecology, Evanston Continence Center, and 2Division of Anesthesia, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston, Illinois.

Address reprint requests to: Address correspondence to: Yoram Abramov, MD, Evanston Continence Center, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 1000 Central Street, Suite 730, Evanston, IL 60201; e-mail: y-abramov{at}northwestern.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of preemptive pudendal nerve blockade on pain and consumption of narcotic analgesia following transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.

METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients undergoing transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery under general anesthesia were randomized to receive pudendal block with either bupivacaine 0.25% or placebo (normal saline 0.9%) immediately before surgery. All patients received postoperative intravenous hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia. Patients were asked to report on their pain intensity 1, 3, 5, 7, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively, using a validated visual analog pain scale from 0–10. Main outcome measures included postoperative pain intensity and hydromorphone consumption.

RESULTS: One hundred ten patients enrolled in the study, of whom 106 underwent randomization, and 102 received pudendal nerve blockade, 51 with bupivacaine and 51 with saline. Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 patients groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative pain intensity (median scores: 1 hour, 4.0 versus 5.0; 3 hours, 3.0 versus 4.0; 7 hours, 2.0 versus 3.0; 18 hours, 3.0 versus 4.0), the consumption of hydromorphone (0–3 hours, 1.84 mg versus 1.77 mg; 4–7 hours, 1.19 mg versus 1.20 mg; 8–18 hours, 2.89 mg versus 2.35 mg), or mean hospital stay (39.6 versus 37.3 hours) between the bupivacaine and saline groups.

CONCLUSION: Preemptive pudendal nerve blockade does not affect postoperative pain intensity or the consumption of narcotic analgesia after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Aissaoui, R. Bruyere, H. Mustapha, D. Bry, N. D. Kamili, and C. Miller
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pudendal Nerve Block for Pain Relief After Episiotomy
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 625 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.