Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;106:533-539
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rattanachaiyanont, M.
Right arrow Articles by Indhavivadhana, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rattanachaiyanont, M.
Right arrow Articles by Indhavivadhana, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow General gynecology
Right arrow Reproductive endocrinology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effectiveness of Intrauterine Anesthesia for Pain Relief During Fractional Curettage

Manee Rattanachaiyanont, MD1, Pichai Leerasiri, MD1 and Suchada Indhavivadhana, MD1

From the 1Gynecologic Endocrinology Unit, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Objective: To study the effectiveness of intrauterine anesthesia for pain relief during fractional curettage.

Methods: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 66 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding undergoing fractional curettage under paracervical block, using 10-mL 1% lidocaine plus intrauterine 5-mL 2% lidocaine (n = 33) or saline (n = 33). The primary outcome was the maximum pain score measured with a 10-cm visual analog scale. Other outcomes measured included pain profile, number of patients with pain score more than 4, each patient's global satisfaction index, adverse events, and serum lidocaine profile.

Results: The 2 groups were comparable in age, body mass index, education, socioeconomic status, menopausal status, and parity. Compared with the saline group, the lidocaine group had a significantly lower median value for the maximum pain score (2.3 versus 4.7, P = .022) and fewer patients with a pain score more than 4 (33.3% versus 60.6%, P = .026). The pain scores were lower at the endocervical curettage and the uterine curettage steps. There was no difference between the 2 groups in other outcomes. The number needed to treat to prevent a case with a pain score more than 4 was 3.7 (95% confidence interval 2.4–38.5).

Conclusion: The addition of intrauterine anesthesia to paracervical block can further reduce pain during fractional curettage without increasing adverse effects.

Level of Evidence: I




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. Guney, B. Oral, and T. Mungan
Efficacy of intrauterine lidocaine for removal of a "lost" intrauterine device: a randomized, controlled trial.
Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2006; 108(1): 119 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Intrauterine Lidocaine Decreases Pain Associated with D&C
Journal Watch Women's Health, November 1, 2005; 2005(1101): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.