Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;105:690-697
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vrouenraets, F. P. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Scheve, E. J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vrouenraets, F. P. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Scheve, E. J. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Labor and operative obstetrics

LEAD ARTICLE

Bishop Score and Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women

Francis P. J. M. Vrouenraets, MD, Frans J. M. E. Roumen, MD, PhD, Cary J. G. Dehing, BSt, Eline S. A. van den Akker, MD, Maureen J. B. Aarts, MD and Esther J. T. Scheve, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk and risk factors for cesarean delivery associated with medical and elective induction of labor in nulliparous women.

METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in nulliparous women at term with vertex singleton gestations who had labor induced at 2 obstetrical centers. Medical and elective indications and Bishop scores were recorded before labor induction. Obstetric and neonatal data were analyzed and compared with the results in women with a spontaneous onset of labor. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariable regression modeling.

RESULTS: A total of 1,389 women were included in the study. The cesarean delivery rate was 12.0% in women with a spontaneous onset of labor (n = 765), 23.4% in women undergoing labor induction for medical reasons (n = 435) (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64–3.06), and 23.8% in women whose labor was electively induced (n = 189) (unadjusted OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.53–3.41). However, after adjusting for the Bishop score at admission, no significant differences in cesarean delivery rates were found among the 3 groups. A Bishop score of 5 or less was a predominant risk factor for a cesarean delivery in all 3 groups (adjusted OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.66–3.25). Other variables with significantly increased risk for cesarean delivery included maternal age of 30 years or older, body mass index of 31 or higher, use of epidural analgesia during the first stage of labor, and birth weight of 3,500 g or higher. In both induction groups, more newborns required neonatal care, more mothers needed a blood transfusion, and the maternal hospital stay was longer.

CONCLUSION: Compared with spontaneous onset of labor, medical and elective induction of labor in nulliparous women at term with a single fetus in cephalic presentation is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery, predominantly related to an unfavorable Bishop score at admission.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
V. M. Allen, C. M. O'Connell, and T. F. Baskett
Maternal Morbidity Associated With Cesarean Delivery Without Labor Compared With Induction of Labor at Term
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2006; 108(2): 286 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
P. C. Tan, R. Jacob, and S. Z. Omar
Membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2006; 107(3): 569 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. Peregrine, P. O'Brien, R. Omar, and E. Jauniaux
Clinical and Ultrasound Parameters to Predict the Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2006; 107(2): 227 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
N. W. Karjane, E. L. Brock, and S. W. Walsh
Induction of Labor Using a Foley Balloon, With and Without Extra-Amniotic Saline Infusion
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2006; 107(2): 234 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
D. M. Slater, S. Astle, N. Woodcock, J. E. Chivers, N. C.J. de Wit, S. Thornton, M. Vatish, and R. Newton
Anti-inflammatory and relaxatory effects of prostaglandin E2 in myometrial smooth muscle
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 12(2): 89 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
B. M. Mercer
Induction of Labor in the Nulliparous Gravida With an Unfavorable Cervix
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2005; 105(4): 688 - 689.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.