Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;105:645-652
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwase, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mizutani, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwase, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mizutani, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infertility including ART
Right arrow Reproductive endocrinology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Use of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Test to Predict Poor Response in In Vitro Fertilization

Akira Iwase, MD, PhD*{dagger}, Hisao Ando, MD, PhD*, Keiko Kuno, MD* and Shigehiko Mizutani, MD, PhD*

From the *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and {dagger}Department of Maternal and Perinatal Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Optimized ovarian stimulation protocols are required for the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF). The purpose of this study was to estimate whether the ovarian reserve test using exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) could predict ovarian response in IVF.

METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 110 patients who underwent their first IVF cycle. The FSH test was administered as 150 IU of urinary FSH daily from day 3 to day 6 of the menstrual cycle preceding the IVF cycle for evaluation of the plasma estradiol level. Outcomes of IVF, including ovarian response, were analyzed.

RESULTS: A negative correlation was observed between the duration of stimulation and the result of the FSH test (r = –.238, P = .014) and between the dose of FSH per retrieved mature oocyte (metaphase II oocyte) and the result of the FSH test (r = –.308, P < .001). In addition, our results showed that the result of the FSH test was significantly lower in poor responders defined by FSH of 400 IU/metaphase II oocyte or greater (207 ± 149 compared with 293 ± 174 pg/mL, P = .007).

CONCLUSION: The FSH test can be a useful tool for determining the conditions of individualized clinical management plans and optimizing stimulation protocols in IVF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Lossl, A.N. Andersen, A. Loft, N.L.C. Freiesleben, S. Bangsboll, and C.Y. Andersen
Androgen priming using aromatase inhibitor and hCG during early-follicular-phase GnRH antagonist down-regulation in modified antagonist protocols
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2593 - 2600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. H. Barad
Use of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Test to Predict Poor Response in In Vitro Fertilization
Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2005; 106(1): 196 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.