Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;105:621-625
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Badger, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Badger, G. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hypertension and PIH
Right arrow Maternal/fetal physiology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Influence of Pregnancy on Arterial Compliance

Ira M. Bernstein, MD*, Amy Thibault, MD*, Joan A. Mongeon, MS{dagger} and Gary J. Badger, MS{dagger}

From the Departments of *Obstetrics and Gynecology and {dagger}Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of pregnancy and the interval between pregnancies on arterial compliance as measured by mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure.

METHODS: We conducted a 3-month chart review of deliveries at a tertiary care hospital (index pregnancies). Data collected included demographics, obstetric history, blood pressures, prepregnancy weight, weight gain, and neonatal outcome. If a subject's first delivery occurred at our institution, these records were reviewed in a similar fashion. Mean antepartum MAP and pulse pressure were calculated and compared for each trimester between index and first pregnancies. Statistical methods employed included repeated measures analysis of variance, repeated measures analysis of covariance, and correlation analysis.

RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five charts were reviewed. Forty-seven women had complete data covering both index and first pregnancy. Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in all trimesters of first compared with index pregnancies (first pregnancy-first trimester 82.0 ± 8.1 mm Hg, index pregnancy-first trimester 79.4 ± 7.6 mm Hg, P = .032; first-second trimester 81.6 ± 6.7 mm Hg, index-second trimester 78.7 ± 6.6 mm Hg, P = .016; first-third trimester 83.9 ± 6.9 mm Hg, index-third trimester 81.6 ± 6.9 mm Hg, P = .047). Repeated measures analysis of covariance confirmed that pregnancy order contributed independently to differences in MAP. The interval between pregnancies was found to be inversely related to the difference in MAP from first to index pregnancies by trimester (r = –0.41, P = .004) and the change in MAP within pregnancy from first to third trimester (r = –0.31, P = .046).

CONCLUSION: Mean arterial pressure is reduced in subsequent pregnancies compared with first pregnancies. This raises the possibility that pregnancy plays a role in modifying cardiovascular compliance. Consistent with this, the effect has temporal limitations in that the shorter the interval between pregnancies, the greater the reduction in MAP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. T. Mikolajczyk, J. Zhang, J. Ford, and J. Grewal
Effects of Interpregnancy Interval on Blood Pressure in Consecutive Pregnancies
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2008; 168(4): 422 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
E. Tronvik, L. J. Stovner, K. Hagen, J. Holmen, and J-A Zwart
High pulse pressure protects against headache: Prospective and cross-sectional data (HUNT study)
Neurology, April 15, 2008; 70(16): 1329 - 1336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.