Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;105:537-542
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rode, L.
Right arrow Articles by Tabor, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rode, L.
Right arrow Articles by Tabor, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology/public health
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Labor and operative obstetrics
Right arrow Obstetric complications of pregnancy

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Obesity-Related Complications in Danish Single Cephalic Term Pregnancies

Line Rode, MD*, Lisbeth Nilas, MD, Dr Sci*, Karen Wøjdemann, MD, PhD* and Ann Tabor, Dr Sci*{dagger}

From the *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre; and {dagger}The Ultrasound Clinic, Juliane Marie Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate the relationship between prepregnancy and obstetric body mass index (BMI) as well as fetal complications in a large, unselected cohort of Danish women with single cephalic pregnancies.

METHODS: A cohort of 8,092 women from the Copenhagen First Trimester Study with a registered prepregnancy BMI and a single cephalic term delivery were stratified into 3 BMI groups: normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). The effects of BMI and parity on the outcome were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS: Overweight women had an odds ratio (OR) of 3.4 for diabetes, 1.9 for hypertension, 1.7 for preeclampsia, and 1.5 for cesarean delivery. The corresponding figures for obese women were 15.3, 4.8, 2.7, and 1.7, respectively. No relationship was found between BMI and vacuum extraction. Obese women had an increased risk of delivering macrosomic but also low birth weight children. No differences existed among the 3 weight groups with regard to neonatal morbidity estimated by Apgar score, umbilical cord pH, or admittance to a neonatal intensive care unit. Nulliparous women had an increased incidence of preeclampsia (OR 2.8), hypertension (OR 1.9), emergency cesarean delivery (OR 3.4), vacuum extraction (OR 5.6), and perineal rupture (OR 1.7) but a lower frequency of elective cesarean delivery (OR 0.25).

CONCLUSION: The rate of complications during pregnancy and delivery increases with an increasing prepregnancy BMI in women with single cephalic term pregnancies, particularly in nulliparous women.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
L. Rode, H. K. Hegaard, H. Kjaergaard, L. F. Moller, A. Tabor, and B. Ottesen
Association Between Maternal Weight Gain and Birth Weight
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2007; 109(6): 1309 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D. M. Jensen, P. Ovesen, H. Beck-Nielsen, L. Molsted-Pedersen, B. Sorensen, C. Vinter, and P. Damm
Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes in 481 Obese Glucose-Tolerant Women
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2005; 28(9): 2118 - 2122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.