Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;105:507-513
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpkins, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bristow, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simpkins, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bristow, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow General gynecology
Right arrow Gynecologic oncology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Ovarian Malignancy in Breast Cancer Patients With an Adnexal Mass

Fiona Simpkins, MD*, Marianna Zahurak, MS{dagger}, Deborah Armstrong, MD{dagger}, Frances Grumbine, MD{ddagger} and Robert Bristow, MD{dagger}

From the *National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; {dagger}The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and {ddagger}Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

Address reprint requests to: Address correspondence to: Fiona Simpkins, MD, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive, Bldg. 10, B1-B40, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; e-mail: simpkinf{at}mail.nih.gov.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to estimate ovarian malignancy rate in breast cancer patients with an adnexal mass and to identify variables predictive of malignancy.

METHODS: This was a review from 1990–2002 including women with breast cancer diagnosed with an adnexal mass who subsequently underwent oophorectomy. Ovarian pathology was classified as benign, primary malignancy, or metastatic breast cancer. Women with preoperative evidence of malignancy were excluded.

RESULTS: Of 129 cases reviewed, benign ovarian cysts were found in 113 cases (88%) and malignant ovarian neoplasms were found in 16 cases (12%). Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of malignancy. Complex masses were 29 times more likely to be malignant (P < .001). Women with estrogen-receptor–negative breast cancer had an increased risk for malignant adnexal masses (44%; OR 12.4, 95% confidence interval 2.4–65.1; P = .003). Patients with an elevated CA 125 had a 6.3-fold increased risk of malignancy, P = .02. Adnexal mass size greater than 5 cm also increased the risk of malignancy (18.8%; OR 4.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2–17.3; P = .02). Malignant adnexal masses had a greater likelihood of being primary ovarian cancer than metastatic breast cancer by 7:1.

CONCLUSION: An isolated adnexal mass in the breast cancer patient is most commonly a benign ovarian cyst. Adnexal masses associated with an increased CA 125, complex architecture by ultrasonography, or size greater than 5cm are significant predictors of malignancy and are indications for referral to a gynecologic oncologist.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.