|
|
||||||||
REVIEWS |
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of MaternalFetal Medicine, University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville, Florida.
OBJECTIVE: To perform an updated systematic review with meta-analysis to further elucidate the efficacy of progestational agents for the prevention of preterm births in patients at elevated risk.
DATA SOURCES: Computerized databases, references in published studies, and textbook chapters in all languages were used to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of progestational agents for the prevention of preterm births in women at elevated risk.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We identified RCTs that compared progestational agents with placebo for patients at risk for preterm birth and evaluated at least one of the following: delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, birth weight less than 2,500 g, threatened preterm labor, respiratory distress syndrome, and perinatal mortality. The primary outcomes assessed were preterm delivery and perinatal mortality.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Ten studies met inclusion criteria for this review. For each study with binary outcomes, an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated for selected outcomes. Homogeneity was tested across the studies. Compared with women allocated to receive placebo, those who received progestational agents had lower rates of preterm delivery (26.2% versus 35.9%; OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.250.80). Similar results were noted when comparing patients who were specifically treated with 17
-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (29.3% versus 40.9%; OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.220.93). Additionally, subjects allocated to receive 17
-hydroxyprogesterone caproate had lower rates of birth weights less than 2,500 g (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.360.71). No differences in rates of hospital admissions for threatened preterm labor or perinatal mortality were noted for subjects receiving progestational agents in general or for those receiving only 17
-hydroxyprogesterone caproate specifically.
CONCLUSION: The use of progestational agents and 17
-hydroxyprogesterone caproate reduced the incidence of preterm birth and low birth weight newborns.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Yellon, C. A. Ebner, and Y. Sugimoto Parturition and Recruitment of Macrophages in Cervix of Mice Lacking the Prostaglandin F Receptor Biol Reprod, March 1, 2008; 78(3): 438 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rebarber, N. B. Istwan, K. Russo-Stieglitz, J. Cleary-Goldman, D. J. Rhea, G. J. Stanziano, and D. H. Saltzman Increased Incidence of Gestational Diabetes in Women Receiving Prophylactic 17{alpha}-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate for Prevention of Recurrent Preterm Delivery Diabetes Care, September 1, 2007; 30(9): 2277 - 2280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chatterjee, J. Gullam, M. Vatish, and S. Thornton The management of preterm labour Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2007; 92(2): F88 - F93. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Ng, B. G. Steinetz, S. G. Lasano, and J. T. Zelikoff Hormonal Changes Accompanying Cigarette Smoke-Induced Preterm Births in a Mouse Model Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2006; 231(8): 1403 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O. Odibo, D. M. Stamilio, G. A. Macones, and D. Polsky 17{alpha}-hydroxyprogesterone Caproate for the Prevention of Preterm Delivery: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis. Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2006; 108(3): 492 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Sheehan, G. E. Rice, E. K. Moses, and S. P. Brennecke 5{beta}-Dihydroprogesterone and steroid 5{beta}-reductase decrease in association with human parturition at term Mol. Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 11(7): 495 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Progestins prevent recurrence of preterm birth BMJ, June 4, 2005; 330(7503): . [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Thangaratinam and A. Coomarasamy Progestational Agents to Prevent Preterm Birth: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2005; 105(6): 1483 - 1484. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |