Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;105:77-79
© 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailit, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mercer, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bailit, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mercer, B. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Labor and operative obstetrics
Right arrow Obstetric complications of pregnancy

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Outcomes of Women Presenting in Active Versus Latent Phase of Spontaneous Labor

Jennifer L. Bailit, MD, MPH, LeRoy Dierker, MD, May Hsieh Blanchard, MD and Brian M. Mercer, MD

From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcome differences between women presenting in latent and active labor.

METHODS: We evaluated all low-risk women with term, singleton, vertex gestations who presented in active phase or latent phase labor at MetroHealth Medical Center from January 1993 to June 2001. Baseline characteristics were compared. Labor outcomes were assessed by logistic regression, controlling for parity.

RESULTS: A total of 6,121 active phase and 2,697 latent phase women met the study criteria. More latent phase women were nulliparous (51 compared with 28%). Latent phase women had more cesarean deliveries (nulliparas 14.2% compared with 6.7%, multiparas 3.1% compared with 1.4%). Controlling for parity, latent phase women had more active phase arrest (odds ratio [OR] 2.2), oxytocin use (OR 2.3), scalp pH performed (OR 2.2), intrauterine pressure catheter placed (OR = 2.2), fetal scalp electrocardiogram monitoring (OR = 1.7), and amnionitis (OR 2.7) (P < .001 for each).

CONCLUSION: It is uncertain whether inherent labor abnormalities resulted in latent phase presentation and subsequent physician intervention or early presentation and subsequent physician intervention are the cause of labor abnormalities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
P. A. Janssen, D. K. Still, M. C. Klein, J. Singer, E. A. Carty, R. M. Liston, and J. A. Zupancic
Early Labor Assessment and Support at Home Versus Telephone Triage: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2006; 108(6): 1463 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.