| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; and Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington.
Address reprint requests to: Victoria L. Holt, PhD, MPH, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences (M4 B874), 1100 Fairview Avenue North, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109; e-mail: vholt{at}u.washington.edu.
OBJECTIVE: This project was supported by grant 1 R01 HD-34712 from the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
To estimate the effect of body mass index (BMI) and weight on risk of pregnancy while using oral contraceptives (OCs).
METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of 248 health maintenance organization enrollees who became pregnant while using OCs between 1998 and 2001 and 533 age-matched enrollees who were nonpregnant OC users during the same period. Using logistic regression we calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) to estimate the risk of pregnancy according to BMI and weight quartile.
RESULTS: Among all OC users, when compared with women having a BMI of 27.3 or less, the risk of pregnancy was nearly 60% higher in women with BMI greater than 27.3 (OR 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–2.24) and over 70% higher in women with BMI greater than 32.2 (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.04–2.82). Among consistent users (women who missed no pills in reference month), the risk of pregnancy was more than doubled in women with BMI greater than 27.3 (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.38–3.41) or BMI greater than 32.2 (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.18–4.20). When compared with women weighing 74.8 kg or less, among consistent OC users the risk of pregnancy was over 70% higher in women weighing more than 74.8 kg (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.08–2.71) and nearly doubled in women weighing more than 86.2 kg (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.06–3.67).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that being overweight may increase the risk of becoming pregnant while using OCs. If causal, this association translates to an additional 2–4 pregnancies per 100 woman-years of use among overweight women, for whom consideration of additional or effective alternative contraceptive methods may be warranted.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Contraception in Women with Medical Problems Journal Watch Women's Health, January 31, 2008; 2008(131): 2 - 2. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. R. Brunner Huber and J. L. Toth Obesity and Oral Contraceptive Failure: Findings from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 166(11): 1306 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. E. Bonny, J. Ziegler, R. Harvey, S. M. Debanne, M. Secic, and B. A. Cromer Weight Gain in Obese and Nonobese Adolescent Girls Initiating Depot Medroxyprogesterone, Oral Contraceptive Pills, or No Hormonal Contraceptive Method Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2006; 160(1): 40 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Meis, M. Klebanoff, M. P. Dombrowski, B. M. Sibai, S. Leindecker, A. H. Moawad, A. Northen, J. D. Iams, M. W. Varner, S. N. Caritis, et al. Does Progesterone Treatment Influence Risk Factors for Recurrent Preterm Delivery? Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2005; 106(3): 557 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Creinin and E. Roberts Body Mass Index, Weight, and Oral Contraceptive Failure Risk Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2005; 105(6): 1492 - 1492. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overweight Women at Higher Risk for OC Failure Journal Watch Women's Health, February 22, 2005; 2005(222): 4 - 4. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Overweight Women at Increased Risk for Oral Contraceptive Failure Journal Watch (General), January 28, 2005; 2005(128): 4 - 4. [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
