Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;104:1051-1057
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kenyon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Neilson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kenyon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Neilson, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Obstetric complications of pregnancy
Right arrow Pediatrics/neonatology
Right arrow Preterm labor

REVIEWS

Antibiotics for Preterm Rupture of the Membranes: A Systematic Review

Sara Kenyon, RM*, Michel Boulvain, MD, PhD{dagger} and Jim Neilson, MD{ddagger}

From the *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leicester, United Kingdom; {dagger}Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Geneva, Switzerland; and {ddagger}Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Address reprint requests to: Michel Boulvain, Maternité-HUG, Geneva 14, CH-1211, Switzerland; e-mail: michel.boulvain{at}hcuge.ch.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the administration of antibiotics to pregnant women with preterm rupture of membranes (PROM).

DATA SOURCES: We collected data by using the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and MEDLINE.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled comparisons of antibiotic versus placebo (14 trials, 6,559 women).

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Antibiotics were associated with a statistically significant reduction in maternal infection and chorioamnionitis. There also was a reduction in the number of infants born within 48 hours and 7 days and with the following morbidities: neonatal infection (relative risk [RR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.85), positive blood culture (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60–0.93), use of surfactant (RR 0.83 95% CI 0.72–0.96), oxygen therapy (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81–0.96), and abnormal cerebral ultrasound scan before discharge from hospital (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68–0.99). Perinatal mortality was not significantly reduced (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.75–1.11). A benefit was present both in trials where penicillins and erythromycin were used. Amoxicillin/clavulanate was associated with a highly significant increase in the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (RR 4.60, 95% CI 1.98–10.72).

CONCLUSION: The administration of antibiotics after PROM is associated with a delay in delivery and a reduction in maternal and neonatal morbidity. These data support the routine use of antibiotics for women with PROM. Penicillins and erythromycin were associated with similar benefits, but erythromycin was used in larger trials and, thus, the results are more robust. Amoxicillin/clavulanate should be avoided in women at risk of preterm delivery because of the increased risk of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Antibiotic administration after PROM is beneficial for both women and neonates.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
G. G. Briggs and S. R. Wan
Drug therapy during labor and delivery, part 1.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 1, 2006; 63(11): 1038 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med., June 1, 2005; 10(3): 95 - 96.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.