Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;104:1015-1020
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J K.
Right arrow Articles by Badger, G J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J K.
Right arrow Articles by Badger, G J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hypertension and PIH
Right arrow Maternal/fetal physiology
Right arrow Obstetric complications of pregnancy

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Seasonal Variation in Preeclampsia Based on Timing of Conception

J K. Phillips, MD*, Ira M. Bernstein, MD*, J A. Mongeon, MS{dagger} and G J. Badger, MS{dagger}

From the Departments of *Obstetrics and Gynecology and {dagger}Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.

OBJECTIVE: Studies have suggested that the incidence of preeclampisa may be partially dependent on the month or season of delivery. We sought to evaluate whether preeclampsia occurs seasonally in our population and whether the timing of conception or delivery is more strongly associated with risk.

METHODS: Between January 1995 and August 2003, we identified 142 primiparous women with singleton pregnancies who met the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ definition for preeclampsia and compared them with 7,762 primiparous control deliveries. We analyzed rates of preeclampsia by individual month and 3-month seasonal blocks based on conception and delivery. Data were analyzed with the {chi}2 test, and logistic regression and odds ratios were calculated where appropriate.

RESULTS: Preeclampsia occurred in 1.8% of singleton primiparous gestations (142/7,904). Cases were younger than controls (26.5 ± 5.6 versus 28.0 ± 0 6.0 years, P < .003), of similar race (97% white versus 96% white, P = .69), and equally likely to have a female child (45% versus 48%, P = .41). We found no significant association of month (logistic regression P = .20) of delivery with the risk of preeclampsia. There was a significant association of month (P = .003) of conception with risk of preeclampsia. Conception during the summer months had the highest risk (incidence 2.3%; odds ratio 1.7; 95% confidence limits 1.06, 2.75) compared with spring (incidence 1.4%). Fall (1.7%) and winter (1.6%) conceptions were associated with intermediate rates of preeclampsia.

CONCLUSION: We identified a seasonal variation in preeclampsia that appears to be more strongly related to timing of conception than to the timing of delivery. The highest incidence of preeclampsia was associated with conception in the summer months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
K.S. Knox and J.C. Baker
Genome-wide expression profiling of placentas in the p57Kip2 model of pre-eclampsia
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 13(4): 251 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.