Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;104:784-788
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Branch, D W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Branch, D W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Genetics and teratology
Right arrow Infertility including ART

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Recurrent Fetal Aneuploidy and Recurrent Miscarriage

Amy E. Sullivan, MD, Robert M. Silver, MD, D Yvette LaCoursiere, MD, T Flint Porter, MD, MPH and D Ware Branch, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Address reprint requests to: Amy Sullivan, md, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Room 2B200, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132; e-mail: amy.sullivan{at}hsc.utah.edu.

OBJECTIVE: Some investigators have found a high frequency of abortus aneuploidy in women with recurrent miscarriage, suggesting the possibility of recurrent aneuploidy as a cause of recurrent miscarriage. Others contend that aneuploidy is not a cause of recurrent miscarriage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between fetal aneuploidy and recurrent miscarriage by estimating whether fetal aneuploidy is more common in patients with recurrent miscarriage than in patients with sporadic miscarriage

METHODS: Recurrent miscarriage cases (n = 135) included women who had a subsequent miscarriage in which an abortus karyotype was obtained. Controls (n = 150) were patients experiencing a sporadic miscarriage who had fetal karyotypes performed as part of a study to assess the utility of abortus tissue for transplantation. Karyotype analysis was performed using standard G-banding techniques.

RESULTS: Abortuses from 122 cases and 133 controls were successfully karyotyped. Thirty-one (25.4%) abortuses from cases and 56 (42.1%) from controls were aneuploid (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.27–0.80). Aneuploid abortuses occurred in 20% of cases and 25% of controls, aged 20–29 years, 19% of cases and 24% of controls, aged 30–34 years, 35% of cases and 47% of controls, aged 35–39 years, and 50% of both cases and controls, aged 40 years or older (not significant). Of 30 cases in whom 2 or more miscarriages were karyotyped, 3 (10%) had aneuploidy in each abortus.

CONCLUSION: In our population of recurrent miscarriage patients, abortus aneuploidy occurred significantly less often than in sporadic miscarriages. The rate of aneuploidy in this study was considerably lower than reported in other studies. If recurrent aneuploidy contributes to recurrent miscarriage, it does so in only a small number of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
K. Bianco, A. B. Caughey, B. L. Shaffer, R. Davis, and M. E. Norton
History of miscarriage and increased incidence of fetal aneuploidy in subsequent pregnancy.
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2006; 107(5): 1098 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Weiss, E. Shalev, and S. Romano
Hysteroscopy may be justified after two miscarriages
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2628 - 2631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.