Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;104:761-769
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ness, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Richter, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ness, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Richter, H. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology/public health
Right arrow Infectious disease
Right arrow Pelvic pain

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bacterial Vaginosis and Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Roberta B. Ness, MD, MPH*, Sharon L. Hillier, PhD*{dagger}, Kevin E. Kip, PhD*, David E. Soper, MD§, Carol A. Stamm, MD, James A. McGregor, MD, Debra C. Bass, MS*, Richard L. Sweet, MD*{dagger}, Peter Rice, MD{ddagger} and Holly E. Richter, PhD, MD||

From the *University of Pittsburgh and {dagger}Magee-Womens Hospital and Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; {ddagger}Boston Medical Center, Maxwell Finland Laboratory, Boston, Massachusetts; §Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; ¶Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado; and ||University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.

Address reprint requests to: Roberta B. Ness, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Room A530 Crabtree Hall, 130 DeSoto Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; e-mail: repro{at}pitt.edu.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis commonly is found in women with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), but it is unclear whether bacterial vaginosis leads to incident PID.

METHODS: Women (n = 1,179) from 5 U.S. centers were evaluated for a median of 3 years. Every 6–12 months, vaginal swabs were obtained for gram stain and culture of microflora. A vaginal microflora gram stain score of 7–10 was categorized as bacterial vaginosis. Pelvic inflammatory disease was diagnosed by presence of either histologic endometritis or pelvic pain and tenderness plus one of the following: oral temperature greater than 38.3°C; sedimentation rate greater than 15 mm/hour; white blood count greater than 10,000; or lower genital tract detection of leukorrhea, mucopus, or Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis.

RESULTS: After adjustment for relevant demographic and lifestyle factors, baseline bacterial vaginosis was not associated with the development of PID (adjusted hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.55–1.45). Carriage of bacterial vaginosis in the previous 6 months before a diagnosis (adjusted risk ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 0.71–2.42) also was not significantly associated with PID. Similarly, neither absence of hydrogen peroxide–producing Lactobacillus nor high levels of Gardnerella vaginalis significantly increased the risk of PID. Dense growth of pigmented, anaerobic gram-negative rods in the 6 months before diagnosis did significantly increase a woman's risk of PID (P = .04). One subgroup of women, women with 2 or more recent sexual partners, demonstrated associations among bacterial vaginosis, Gardnerella vaginalis, anaerobic gram-negative rods, and PID.

CONCLUSION: In this cohort of high-risk women, after adjustment for confounding factors, we found no overall increased risk of developing incident PID among women with bacterial vaginosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.