|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |


From the *Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and
Biochemistry, SSK Ankara Maternity and Women's Health Hospital, and
Department of Biostatistics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Address reprint requests to: R. Atakan Al, Cigdem Mah. 357. Sok, Segmen sitesi A Blok No 7/25, 06530 Karakusunlar, Ankara, Turkey; e-mail: atakanal{at}superonline.com.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of random urine protein-creatinine ratio for prediction of significant proteinuria (
300 mg/24 h) in patients with new-onset mild hypertension in late pregnancy.
METHODS: Medical records of 185 consecutive pregnant patients with new onset of mild hypertension in late pregnancy were reviewed. Random urine samples were taken before 24-hour urine collection. The predictive values of the random urine protein-creatinine ratio for diagnosis of significant proteinuria were estimated by using at least a 300-mg protein level within the collected 24-hour urine as the gold standard.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (21%) had significant proteinuria. There was a significant association between 24-hour protein excretion and the random urine protein-creatinine ratio (rs = 0.56, P < .01). With a cutoff protein-creatinine ratio greater than 0.19 as a predictor of significant proteinuria, sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 73%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values of the test were 46% and 95%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The random urine protein-creatinine ratio was a poor predictor for significant proteinuria in patients with new-onset mild hypertension in late pregnancy.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. A Marnoch, L. Larson, S. Weitzen, M. G Phipps, C J. Sung, and R. O Powrie A practical approach to using spot urine protein/creatinine ratios for assessing proteinuria in pregnancy Obstet Med, September 1, 2008; 1(1): 18 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Chen, K. Parviainen, and A. Jeyabalan Correlation of Catheterized and Clean Catch Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios in Preeclampsia Evaluation Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2008; 112(3): 606 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Papanna, L. K. Mann, R. W. Kouides, and J. C. Glantz Protein/Creatinine Ratio in Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2008; 112(1): 135 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Leanos-Miranda, J. Marquez-Acosta, F. Romero-Arauz, G. M. Cardenas-Mondragon, R. Rivera-Leanos, I. Isordia-Salas, and A. Ulloa-Aguirre Protein:Creatinine Ratio in Random Urine Samples Is a Reliable Marker of Increased 24-Hour Protein Excretion in Hospitalized Women with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Clin. Chem., September 1, 2007; 53(9): 1623 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Price, R. G. Newall, and J. C. Boyd Use of Protein:Creatinine Ratio Measurements on Random Urine Samples for Prediction of Significant Proteinuria: A Systematic Review Clin. Chem., September 1, 2005; 51(9): 1577 - 1586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Walerstein Review: point of care dipstick urinalysis has low accuracy for detecting proteinuria in pregnancy Evid. Based Med., February 1, 2005; 10(1): 25 - 25. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |