Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;104:232-237
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleary-Goldman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schulkin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleary-Goldman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schulkin, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Medical education

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Multiple Pregnancy: Knowledge and Practice Patterns of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Jane Cleary-Goldman, MD*, Maria A. Morgan, PhD{dagger}, Julian N. Robinson, MD{ddagger}, Mary E. D'Alton, MD* and Jay Schulkin, PhD{dagger}

From the *Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; {dagger}Department of Research, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC; and {ddagger}Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Massachusetts.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess knowledge and practices of obstetricians regarding multiple gestation.

METHODS: A questionnaire investigating knowledge and practice patterns pertaining to multiple gestation was mailed to randomly selected American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Fellows and Junior Fellows in January 2003. Fifty-one percent (589/1,146) of the surveys were returned.

RESULTS: Statistical analysis included the responses from 430 practicing obstetricians. More than 60% rated their training regarding management of multiples as adequate. Men (56.5%) were older and had been in practice longer than females. Sixty-two percent of general obstetrician–gynecologists managed twins without input from a maternal–fetal medicine specialist. An understanding of chorionicity was less than anticipated. The majority of practitioners managed twins according to recent ACOG educational materials. They did not use prophylactic cerclage, home uterine-activity monitoring, or tocolytics. Fort-six percent encouraged prophylactic bed rest. The management of breech second twins varied.

CONCLUSION: Most obstetricians manage multiples according to current ACOG educational materials independent of maternal–fetal medicine specialists. This survey identified knowledge gaps, specifically in chorionicity, indicating the need to develop educational strategies addressing these insufficiencies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. P. Elliott
Multiple Pregnancy: Knowledge and Practice Patterns of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2005; 105(1): 215 - 215.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. Cleary-Goldman, M. A. Morgan, J. N. Robinson, M. E. D'alton, and J. Schulkin
Multiple Pregnancy: Knowledge and Practice Patterns of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2005; 105(1): 215 - 216.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.