Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;104:56-64
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fretts, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Heffner, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fretts, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Heffner, L. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Should Older Women Have Antepartum Testing to Prevent Unexplained Stillbirth?

Ruth C. Fretts, MD, MPH*, Elena B. Elkin, PhD{dagger}, Evan R. Myers, MD, MPH{ddagger} and Linda J. Heffner, MD, PhD§

From *Harvard Medical Associates, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; {dagger}Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Boston, Massachusetts; {ddagger}Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and §Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address reprint requests to: Ruth C. Fretts MD, MPH, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, 230 Worcester Street, Wellesley, MA 02481; e-mail: ruth_fretts{at}vmed.org.

OBJECTIVE: Older women are at an increased risk for unexplained stillbirth late in pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 strategies for the prevention of unexplained fetal death in women aged 35 years and older. We compared usual care (no antepartum testing or induction before 41 weeks), weekly testing at 37 weeks with induction after a positive test, and no testing with induction at 41 weeks.

METHOD: We used a Markov model to quantify the risks and benefits of each strategy in terms of the number of antepartum tests, inductions, and additional cesarean deliveries per fetal death averted. Probability data used in the model were derived from obstetrical databases and the literature.

RESULTS: Without a strategy of antepartum surveillance between 37 and 41 weeks, women aged 35 years and older would experience 5.2 unexplained fetal deaths per 1,000 pregnancies. For nulliparous women 35 and older, weekly antepartum testing initiated at 37 weeks would avert 3.9 fetal deaths per 1,000 pregnancies but would require 863 antepartum tests, 71 inductions, and 14 additional cesarean deliveries per fetal death averted. A strategy of no testing but induction at 41 weeks would avert 0.9 fetal deaths per 1,000 pregnancies and require 469 inductions and 219 additional cesareans per fetal death averted.

CONCLUSION: A strategy of antepartum testing in older women would reduce the number of unexplained stillbirths at term and would result in fewer inductions and cesareans per fetal death averted than a strategy of no antepartum testing but induction at 41 weeks.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
How Much Does Parity Matter?
Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2005; 106(3): 444 - 445.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. F. Meikle, C. A. Steiner, J. Zhang, and W. L. Lawrence
A National Estimate of the Elective Primary Cesarean Delivery Rate
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2005; 105(4): 751 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.