Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;104:102-109
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, J. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ethics
Right arrow Genetics and teratology
Right arrow Prenatal Diagnosis
Right arrow Abortion

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Fetal Reduction From Twins to a Singleton

A Reasonable Consideration?

Mark I. Evans, MD, Marion I. Kaufman, RN, Anita J. Urban, RDMS, David W. Britt, PhD and John C. Fletcher, PhD

From the Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University, New York; Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Address reprint requests to: Mark I. Evans, MD, Director, Institute for Genetics and Fetal Medicine, Suite 11A-11, 1000 10th Avenue, New York, NY 10019; e-mail: IGFM{at}chpnet.org.

OBJECTIVE: In the past, our group took the position that we would not provide multifetal pregnancy reduction to a singleton regardless of starting number except for serious maternal medical indications or as a selective termination for diagnosed fetal anomalies. With evidence of increased safety and more women (many aged 40 years or more) asking for counseling about reduction to a singleton, we reviewed our prior reasoning.

METHODS: We compared outcomes of 52 first-trimester twin-to-singleton for multifetal pregnancy reduction cases performed by a single operator to twin and singleton data from recent national register studies.

RESULTS: Twin-to-singleton reductions represent less than 3% of all cases. Forty of 52 patients were aged 35 years or more, 19 were aged more than 40 years, and 2 were aged more than 50 years (age range 32–54 years). Since 1999, 23 of 28 had chorionic villus sampling before multifetal pregnancy reduction. Fifty-one of 52 reached viability with mean gestational age at delivery of 37.2 weeks. One of 52 patients miscarried (1.9%). Compared with multiple sources of data for twins, the loss rate is lower in twins reduced to a singleton.

CONCLUSION: Until recently, multifetal pregnancy reductions to a singleton were rare. Physicians were concerned about the unknown risks of multifetal pregnancy reduction in this situation. They also had moral doubts about the justification to go "below twins." However, physicians know that spontaneous twin pregnancy losses average 8–10%. Also, with experience, multifetal pregnancy reduction has become very safe in our hands. Our data suggest that the likelihood of taking home a baby is higher after reduction than remaining with twins. We propose that twin-to-singleton reductions might be considered with appropriate constraints and safeguards.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. Quarello, G. Gorincour, and S. Tassy
Fetal Reduction From Twins to a Singleton: Selective Reduction or Partial Abortion?
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2004; 104(6): 1423 - 1424.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
K. M. Raviele and K. Daus
Fetal Reduction From Twins to a Singleton: Selective Reduction or Partial Abortion?
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2004; 104(6): 1424 - 1424.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.