|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |



From *Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC;
National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland; and
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Address reprint requests to: Shad Deering, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgetown University Hospital, 3-PHC, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington, DC 20007; e-mail: deering95{at}hotmail.com.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a simulation training scenario improves resident competency in the management of shoulder dystocia.
METHODS: Residents from 2 training programs participated in this study. The residents were block-randomized by year-group to a training session on shoulder dystocia management that used an obstetric birthing simulator or to a control group with no specific training. Trained residents and control subjects were subsequently tested on a standardized shoulder dystocia scenario, and the encounters were digitally recorded. A physician grader from an external institution then graded and rated the resident's performance with a standardized evaluation sheet. Statistical analysis included the Student t test,
2, and regression analysis, as appropriate.
RESULTS: Trained residents had significantly higher scores in all evaluation categories, including timelines of their interventions, performance of maneuvers, and overall performance. They also performed the delivery in a shorter time than control subjects (61 versus 146 seconds, P = .003).
CONCLUSION: Training with a simulation-training scenario improved resident performance in the management of shoulder dystocia.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. J. Draycott, J. F. Crofts, J. P. Ash, L. V. Wilson, E. Yard, T. Sibanda, and A. Whitelaw Improving Neonatal Outcome Through Practical Shoulder Dystocia Training Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2008; 112(1): 14 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Draycott, C. Sanders, J. Crofts, and J. Lloyd A template for reviewing the strength of evidence for obstetric brachial plexus injury in clinical negligence claims Clin Risk, May 1, 2008; 14(3): 96 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J F Crofts, C Bartlett, D Ellis, C Winter, F Donald, L P Hunt, and T J Draycott Patient-actor perception of care: a comparison of obstetric emergency training using manikins and patient-actors Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 20 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Crofts, C. Bartlett, D. Ellis, L. P. Hunt, R. Fox, and T. J. Draycott Management of Shoulder Dystocia: Skill Retention 6 and 12 Months After Training Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2007; 110(5): 1069 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Crofts, C. Bartlett, D. Ellis, L. P. Hunt, R. Fox, and T. J. Draycott Training for Shoulder Dystocia: A Trial of Simulation Using Low-Fidelity and High-Fidelity Mannequins Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2006; 108(6): 1477 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Deering, J. Brown, J. Hodor, and A. J. Satin Simulation Training and Resident Performance of Singleton Vaginal Breech Delivery Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2006; 107(1): 86 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Deering and A. J. Satin Evaluation of Residents' Delivery Notes After a Simulated Shoulder Dystocia Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2005; 105(2): 448 - 449. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Deering, S. Poggi, J. Hodor, C. Macedonia, and A. J. Satin Evaluation of Residents' Delivery Notes After a Simulated Shoulder Dystocia Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2004; 104(4): 667 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Cyr Improving Resident Competency in the Management of Shoulder Dystocia With Simulation Training Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2004; 104(3): 633 - 634. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |