HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Covington, D. L. Articles by Daniels, E. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Covington, D. L. Articles by Daniels, E. M. Related Collections Epidemiology/public health General obstetrics Genetics and teratology Infectious disease

Risk of Birth Defects Associated With Nelfinavir Exposure During Pregnancy

Deborah L. Covington, DrPH^*, Susan D. Conner, Peggy A. Doi^*, Jayme Swinson, MS^* and Elaine M. Daniels, MD, PhD

From *Inveresk, Cary, North Carolina, and Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., La Jolla, California (A Pfizer Company).

Address reprint requests to: Deborah L. Covington, DrPH, Inveresk, 1011 Ashes Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405; e-mail: deborah.covington{at}inveresk.com.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the human teratogenic risk of the protease inhibitor, nelfinavir mesylate, used to treat human immunodeficiency virus.

METHODS: This study used a subset of data from the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry, which was designed to monitor prenatal exposures to antiretroviral therapy and detect a potential increase in the risk of birth defects. The registry uses a prospective exposure-registration cohort design. All records of pregnant women exposed to nelfinavir, used alone or in combination, were extracted and analyzed. The prevalence of birth defects was compared with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) population-based surveillance system.

RESULTS: Through July 2002, the registry had monitored 915 live births exposed to nelfinavir. Among 301 first-trimester exposures, there were 9 birth defects, for a prevalence of 3% (95% confidence interval 1.4, 5.6). This rate is not significantly different from the CDC's system, which had a prevalence of 3.1 per 100 live births (95% confidence interval 3.1, 3.2; P = .99). There was no consistent pattern among reported birth defects.

CONCLUSION: Adequate numbers of first-trimester exposures to nelfinavir have been monitored to detect a 2-fold increase in the prevalence of overall birth defects. No such increases have been detected when compared with the CDC rate. However, the numbers are not sufficient to detect any increased rate of specific defects. Although nelfinavir should only be used in pregnancy if the benefits outweigh the potential risks, the findings from this study should provide some assurance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Nelfinavir Exposure During Pregnancy Probably Doesn't Cause Birth Defects Journal Watch (General), July 9, 2004; 2004(709): 5 - 5. [Full Text]