Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;103:842-847
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blaivas, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Panagopoulos, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blaivas, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Panagopoulos, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow General gynecology
Right arrow Urogynecology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Periurethral Masses: Etiology and Diagnosis in a Large Series of Women

Jerry G. Blaivas, MD*{dagger}, Adam J. Flisser, MD{ddagger}, Clifford B. Bleustein, MD§ and Georgia Panagopoulos, PhD{dagger}

From the *Joan and Sanford Weill College of Medicine, Cornell University, New York; {dagger}Lenox Hill Hospital, New York; {ddagger}Division of Urogynecology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York; and §Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.

Address reprint requests to: Jerry G. Blaivas, MD, 445 East 77th Street, New York, NY 10021; e-mail: JBLVS{at}aol.com.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the differential diagnosis of periurethral masses in a consecutive series extracted from a single tertiary urogynecologic practice database.

METHODS: A patient database of a private urology and urogynecology practice with 1,950 women was searched for patients who were found to have a periurethral mass during the accrual dates of 1994 to 2002, and these records were reviewed for diagnostic testing and results. All women provided a history, completed a questionnaire, and underwent physical examination, voiding diary, cystoscopy, and videourodynamic testing; selected patients then underwent additional imaging.

RESULTS: Seventy-nine (4%) patients aged 41.2 ± 14 years were identified. Of these, 72 (91%) had been referred for evaluation of persistent irritative lower urinary tract symptoms or incontinence. Seven patients (9%) had been referred specifically because of a periurethral mass. Sixty-six patients (84%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 73%, 91%) had urethral diverticula, of which 4 (6%; 95% CI 2%, 14.8%) contained malignancies. Six patients (7%; 95% CI 3%, 15%) had vaginal cysts histologically identified as fibromuscular tissue, 4 (5%; 95% CI 1%, 12%) had leiomyomata, and 2 (2.5%; 95% CI 0.03%, 8.8%) had ectopic ureteroceles. Two patients had vaginal squamous cell carcinomas (2.5%; 95% CI 0.03%, 8.8%), and 1 had an infected granuloma. Masses were palpable in 42 patients (53.8%; 95% CI 42%, 64%) and in 37 patients either were encountered at surgery (n = 5) or were urethral diverticula diagnosed by voiding cystourethrogram (n = 32).

CONCLUSION: Periurethral masses were encountered in less than 4% of our patient sample. Most masses were urethral diverticula; however, the differential diagnosis included leiomyoma, vaginal cysts, and malignancy. Masses were generally either palpable or seen at imaging studies performed during evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: iii




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Periurethral Masses Are Rare -- And Usually Benign
Journal Watch (General), May 18, 2004; 2004(518): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.