Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;103:653-656
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mancuso, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leveno, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mancuso, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leveno, K. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow General obstetrics

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Timing of Birth After Spontaneous Onset of Labor

Peggy J. Mancuso, PhD, CNM, James M. Alexander, MD, Donald D. McIntire, PhD, Emma Davis, MS, WHNP, Grace Burke, CNM, THD and Kenneth J. Leveno, MD

From the College of Nursing, Texas Woman's University and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Address reprint requests to: James M. Alexander, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75235-9032; e-mail: james.alexander{at}utsouthwestern.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To describe naturally occurring birth patterns in low-risk women with singleton gestations and spontaneous onset of labor at term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The timing of birth of women who delivered in the low-risk labor unit at Parkland Hospital, Dallas, Texas, between January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2000, was analyzed. Women admitted to this unit were between 360/7 and 416/7 weeks of gestation, were in spontaneous labor, and had a singleton gestation. Women with contraindications to labor, significant medical problems, a known fetal anomaly, and stillbirths were excluded from analysis. The frequency of birth was analyzed in relation to the time of day, day of week, and month of the year.

RESULTS: Low-risk women (n = 6,608) met the study criteria and were included in the analysis. No association was found between the day of the week and the frequency of births (P = .31). Births were most common between the hours of 1 to 2 pm and least common between the hours of 10:00 to 12:00 hours (Central Standard Time, P = .04). Births were more common in the fall, September through November, and least common in the winter, December through February. Daylight Saving Time did not affect these results.

CONCLUSION: Birth after the spontaneous onset of labor is most common in the early afternoon, and most births occur in the fall. There is no natural association between spontaneous birth in low-risk women and the day of the week.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. M. Dodd, C. A. Crowther, and J. S. Robinson
Morning Compared With Evening Induction of Labor: A Nested Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2006; 108(2): 350 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Dolatshad, E.A. Campbell, L. O'Hara, E.S. Maywood, M.H. Hastings, and M.H. Johnson
Developmental and reproductive performance in circadian mutant mice
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 68 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
E. B. Klerman
Clinical Aspects of Human Circadian Rhythms
J Biol Rhythms, August 1, 2005; 20(4): 375 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.