|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |

From the *Division of MaternalFetal Medicine and the
Division of General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of house staff working hours reforms on the quality of obstetric and gynecologic care.
METHODS: Sentinel events, medication errors, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and decision making were measured before and after the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education work-hour reforms. Data sources consisted of the perinatal database at MetroHealth Medical Center (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH), incident reports filed in the hospital department of risk management, the patient-satisfaction database at MetroHealth Medical Center, and the pharmacy medication error database. Two reviewers examined all incident reports separately, and discrepancies were resolved by mutual agreement.
RESULTS: Patient demographics did not change across the 2 time periods. Obstetric outcomes were the same for third- and fourth-degree lacerations, umbilical arterial pH less than 7, fever, and the need for general anesthesia. Postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal resuscitations were significantly decreased over time (2% before versus 1% after work-hour restrictions [P = .008], and 30% before versus 26% after work-hour restrictions [P < .001], respectively). The rate of primary cesarean delivery rose from 14% to 16%, a nonsignificant difference (P < .06). There were no differences in rates of cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status, failed induction, labor abnormality, or repeat cesarean delivery. Reported medication errors associated with resident performance were too rare for comparison across time periods. The number of incident reports directly involving residents before and after work-hour restrictions were 3 and 10, respectivelytoo few to reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Although problems in physician performance may be underreported, resident work-hour restrictions show minimal evidence of improvement in quality of care.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Jagsi, D. F. Weinstein, J. Shapiro, B. T. Kitch, D. Dorer, and J. S. Weissman The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Limits on Residents' Work Hours and Patient Safety: A Study of Resident Experiences and Perceptions Before and After Hours Reductions Arch Intern Med, March 10, 2008; 168(5): 493 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Salim, P. G. R. Teixeira, L. Chan, D. Oncel, K. Inaba, C. Brown, P. Rhee, and T. V. Berne Impact of the 80-Hour Workweek on Patient Care at a Level I Trauma Center Arch Surg, August 1, 2007; 142(8): 708 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Shetty and J. Bhattacharya Changes in Hospital Mortality Associated with Residency Work-Hour Regulations Ann Intern Med, July 17, 2007; 147(2): 73 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Horwitz, M. Kosiborod, Z. Lin, and H. M. Krumholz Changes in Outcomes for Internal Medicine Inpatients after Work-Hour Regulations Ann Intern Med, July 17, 2007; 147(2): 97 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Mycyk, M. R. McDaniel, M. A. Fotis, and J. Regalado Hospitalwide adverse drug events before and after limiting weekly work hours of medical residents to 80 Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., August 1, 2005; 62(15): 1592 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Zuckerman, E. N. Kubiak, I. Immerman, and P. DiCesare The Early Effects of Code 405 Work Rules on Attitudes of Orthopaedic Residents and Attending Surgeons J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2005; 87(4): 903 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Queenan Work-Hour Limitations: Let's Solve Our Own Problems Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2004; 103(4): 611 - 612. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |