Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;103:551-563
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Croughan, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Croughan, M. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow General obstetrics
Right arrow Infertility including ART

REVIEWS

Perinatal Outcomes in Singletons Following In Vitro Fertilization: A Meta-Analysis

Rebecca A. Jackson, MD, Kimberly A. Gibson, MD, MPH, Yvonne W. Wu, MD, MPH and Mary S. Croughan, PhD

From the Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco; and Departments of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Address reprint requests to: Rebecca Jackson, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, #6D, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110; e-mail: jacksonr{at}obgyn.ucsf.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization (IVF) are at higher risk of perinatal mortality, preterm delivery, small for gestational age, and low or very low birth weight compared with spontaneous conceptions in studies that adjusted for age and parity.

DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, BIOSIS, Doctoral Dissertations On-Line, bibliographies, and conference proceedings for studies from 1978–2002 using the terms "in vitro fertilization," "female infertility therapy," and "reproductive techniques" combined with "fetal death," "mortality," "fetal growth restriction," "small for gestational age," "birth weight," "premature labor," "pre-term delivery," "infant," "obstetric," "perinatal," and "neonatal."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies following IVF compared with spontaneous conceptions, control for maternal age and parity; 1 of the above outcomes; and risk ratios or data to determine them. Study selection and data abstraction were performed in duplicate after removing identifying information.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprising 12,283 IVF and 1.9 million spontaneously conceived singletons were identified. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Compared with spontaneous conceptions, IVF singleton pregnancies were associated with significantly higher odds of each of the perinatal outcomes examined: perinatal mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 3.0), preterm delivery (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.7, 2.2), low birth weight (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4, 2.2), very low birth weight (OR 2.7; 95% CI 2.3, 3.1), and small for gestational age (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3, 2.0). Statistical heterogeneity was noted only for preterm delivery and low birth weight. Sensitivity analyses revealed no significant changes in results. Early preterm delivery, spontaneous preterm delivery, placenta previa, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and neonatal intensive care admission were also significantly more prevalent in the IVF group.

CONCLUSION: In vitro fertilization patients should be advised of the increased risk for adverse perinatal outcomes. Obstetricians should not only manage these pregnancies as high risk but also avoid iatrogenic harm caused by elective preterm labor induction or cesarean.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. C. J. Scheepers and D. Braat
Birth spacing and adverse perinatal outcomes.
JAMA, August 23, 2006; 296(8): 929 - 929.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Thurin, J. Hausken, T. Hillensjo, B. Jablonowska, A. Pinborg, A. Strandell, and C. Bergh
Elective Single-Embryo Transfer versus Double-Embryo Transfer in in Vitro Fertilization
N. Engl. J. Med., December 2, 2004; 351(23): 2392 - 2402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.