Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;103:499-505
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benedetti, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hart, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benedetti, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hart, L. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology/public health

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Productivity of Washington State’s Obstetrician–Gynecologist Workforce: Does Gender Make a Difference?

Thomas J. Benedetti, MD, MHA, Laura-Mae Baldwin, MD, MPH, C. Holly A. Andrilla, MS and L. Gary Hart, PhD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Address reprint requests to: Thomas Benedetti, MD, MHA, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Box 356460, Seattle, WA 98195-6460; e-mail: benedeti{at}u.washington.edu.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the practice productivity of female and male obstetrician–gynecologists in Washington State.

METHODS: The primary data collection tool was a practice survey that accompanied each licensed practitioner’s license renewal in 1998–1999. Washington State birth certificate data were linked with the licensure data to obtain objective information regarding obstetric births.

RESULTS: Of the 541 obstetrician–gynecologists identified, two thirds were men and one third were women. Women were significantly younger than men (mean age 43.3 years versus 51.7 years). Ten practice variables were evaluated: total weeks worked per year, total professional hours per week, direct patient care hours per week, nondirect patient care hours per week, outpatient visits per week, inpatient visits per week, percent practicing obstetrics, number of obstetrical deliveries per year, percentage working less than 32 hours per week, and percentage working 60 or more hours per week. Of these, only 2 variables showed significant differences: inpatient visits per week (women 10.1 per week, men 12.8 per week, P <= .01) and working 60 or more hours per week (women 22.1% versus men 31.5%, P <= .05). After controlling for age, analysis of covariance and multiple logistic regression confirmed these findings and in addition showed that women worked 4.1 fewer hours per week than men (P < .01). When examining the ratio of female-to-male practice productivity in 10-year age increments from the 30–39 through the 50–59 age groups, a pattern emerged suggesting lower productivity in many variables in the women in the 40–49 age group.

CONCLUSION: Only small differences in practice productivity between men and women were demonstrated in a survey of nearly all obstetrician–gynecologists in Washington State. Changing demographics and behaviors of the obstetrician–gynecologist workforce will require ongoing longitudinal studies to confirm these findings and determine whether they are generalizable to the rest of the United States.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.