Obstetrics & Gynecology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;103:447-451
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Umek, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by DeLancey, J. O. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Umek, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by DeLancey, J. O. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow General gynecology
Right arrow Gynecologic surgery
Right arrow Imaging
Right arrow Urogynecology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Quantitative Analysis of Uterosacral Ligament Origin and Insertion Points by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Wolfgang H. Umek, MD, Daniel M. Morgan, MD, James A. Ashton-Miller, PhD and John O. L. DeLancey, MD

From the Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Biomechanical Engineering, and Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Address reprint requests to: Wolfgang H. Umek, MD, Division of Gynecology, General Hospital Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Wien, Austria; e-mail: wolfgang.umek{at}univie.ac.at.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the percentage of healthy women in whom the uterosacral ligaments are identifiable on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and to determine origin points from the genital tract and insertion points on the pelvic sidewall.

METHODS: Eighty-two asymptomatic women (mean ± standard deviation age 53 ± 12 years; mean parity 2.5, range 0–7) volunteered for this study. They were eligible if the most dependent vaginal wall point lay at least 1 cm above the hymenal ring remnant during a Valsalva maneuver. Axial proton density MRI of the entire pelvis was analyzed at 5-mm intervals. All results were referenced to the ischial spine. We determined the visibility of the uterosacral ligaments and located their origins from the genital tract and their insertion points on the pelvic sidewall.

RESULTS: Uterosacral ligaments were visible in 61 (87%) of 70 analyzable scans. They extended over a mean craniocaudal distance of 21 ± 8 mm (range 10–50). Three regions of origin were found: cervix alone, cervix and vagina in the same section, and vagina alone. Thirty-three percent, 63%, and 4% of 254 identified origin points were from these three areas, respectively. Of 259 uterosacral insertion points, 82% overlaid the sacrospinous ligament/coccygeus muscle complex, 7% the sacrum, and 11% the piriformis muscle, the sciatic foramen, or the ischial spine. Although uterosacral ligament morphology was similar bilaterally, its craniocaudal extent was greater on the right side.

CONCLUSION: In healthy women, the uterosacral ligament origin and insertion points exhibited greater anatomic variation than their name would imply.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.