|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH |
From the Biostatistics Branch and Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; and Department of Statistics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Address reprint requests to: David B. Dunson, PhD, Biostatistics Branch, MD A3-03, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, PO Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; e-mail: dunson1{at}niehs.nih.gov.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of aging on the percentage of outwardly healthy couples who are sterile (completely unable to conceive without assisted reproduction) or infertile (unable to conceive within a year of unprotected intercourse).
METHODS: A prospective fecundability study was conducted in a sample of 782 couples recruited from 7 European centers for natural family planning. Women aged 1840 years were eligible. Daily intercourse records were used to adjust for timing and frequency of intercourse when estimating the per-menstrual-cycle probability of conception. The number of menstrual cycles required to conceive a clinical pregnancy and the probability of sterility and infertility were derived from the estimated fecundability distributions for men and women of different ages.
RESULTS: Sterility was estimated at about 1%; this percent did not change with age. The percentage infertility was estimated at 8% for women aged 1926 years, 1314% for women aged 2734 years and 18% for women aged 3539 years. Starting in the late 30s, male age was an important factor, with the percentage failing to conceive within 12 cycles increasing from an estimated 1828% between ages 35 and 40 years. The estimated percentage of infertile couples that would be able to conceive after an additional 12 cycles of trying varied from 4363% depending on age.
CONCLUSION: Increased infertility in older couples is attributable primarily to declines in fertility rates rather than to absolute sterility. Many infertile couples will conceive if they try for an additional year.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. R. te Velde, M. J.C. Eijkemans, G. Beets, and J. D. F. Habbema Can assisted reproductive technologies help to offset population ageing? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2173 - 2174. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hoorens, F. Gallo, J. Cave, and J. Grant Reply: Can assisted reproductive technologies help offset population ageing? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2174 - 2175. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Cristia The Effect of a First Child on Female Labor Supply: Evidence from Women Seeking Fertility Services J. Human Resources, July 1, 2008; 43(3): 487 - 510. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.A. Wang, D. Healy, D. Black, and E.A. Sullivan Age-specific success rate for women undertaking their first assisted reproduction technology treatment using their own oocytes in Australia, 2002-2005 Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1633 - 1638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Fallat, J. Hutter, and the Committee on Bioethics, Section on Hematology/ Preservation of Fertility in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Cancer Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): e1461 - e1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Siemer, O. Theile, Y. Larbi, P. A. Fasching, K. A. Danso, R. Kreienberg, and A. Essig Chlamydia trachomatis Infection as a Risk Factor for Infertility among Women in Ghana, West Africa Am J Trop Med Hyg, February 1, 2008; 78(2): 323 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Keeney and D. A. Vernik Analysis of the Biological Clock Decision Decision Analysis, September 1, 2007; 4(3): 114 - 135. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hoorens, F. Gallo, J.A.K. Cave, and J.C. Grant Can assisted reproductive technologies help to offset population ageing? An assessment of the demographic and economic impact of ART in Denmark and UK Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2471 - 2475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H.N. Nguyen, A. J. Wilcox, R. Skjaerven, and D. D. Baird Men's body mass index and infertility Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2488 - 2493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ecochard Heterogeneity in fecundability studies: issues and modelling Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 141 - 160. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group Fertility and ageing Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2005; 11(3): 261 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gnoth, E. Godehardt, P. Frank-Herrmann, K. Friol, J. Tigges, and G. Freundl Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1144 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yu, J. S. Sidhu, S. Hong, and E. M. Faustman Essential Role of Extracellular Matrix (ECM) Overlay in Establishing the Functional Integrity of Primary Neonatal Rat Sertoli Cell/Gonocyte Co-cultures: An Improved In Vitro Model for Assessment of Male Reproductive Toxicity Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2005; 84(2): 378 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Snick, J. L.H. Evers, and J. A. Collins An update on the age of subfertile couples in Walcheren: age at registration mirrors increasing age at first birth Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 572 - 573. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gonsalves, F. Sun, P. N. Schlegel, P. J. Turek, C. V. Hopps, C. Greene, R. H. Martin, and R. A. R. Pera Defective recombination in infertile men Hum. Mol. Genet., November 15, 2004; 13(22): 2875 - 2883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kuhnert and E. Nieschlag Reproductive functions of the ageing male Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 327 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |