Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;103:47-50
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tulandi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Jaroudi, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tulandi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Jaroudi, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endoscopic surgery
Right arrow General gynecology
Right arrow Infertility including ART

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Interstitial Pregnancy: Results Generated From the Society of Reproductive Surgeons Registry

Togas Tulandi, MD and Dania Al-Jaroudi, MD

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Address reprint requests to: Togas Tulandi, MD, McGill University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada; e-mail: togas.tulandi{at}mcgill.ca.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize management of interstitial pregnancy and its outcome among 32 reported cases in the world

METHODS: From 1999 to 2002, 32 cases of interstitial pregnancy were reported to the registry of the Society of Reproductive Surgeons. The participants completed a five-page questionnaire regarding when and how diagnosis was made, the characteristics of the pregnancy, treatment modalities, and subsequent reproductive outcome.

RESULTS: History of ipsilateral salpingectomy was encountered in 37.5% of patients, and the diagnosis was made by ultrasound in 71.4% of the patients. Eight women were treated with methotrexate either systemically (n = 4), locally under ultrasound guidance (n = 2), or under laparoscopic guidance (n = 2). Eleven patients were treated by laparoscopy and 13 by laparotomy. Three patients failed systemic methotrexate treatment and subsequently required surgery. Persistently elevated serum ß human chorionic gonadotropin levels were found in one patient after laparoscopic cornual excision, and she was successfully treated with methotrexate. Fourteen cases (43.7%) of rupture of interstitial pregnancy were found. This included five cases (15.6%) of heterotopic pregnancy; all were the results of in vitro fertilization, and all ruptured at the time of diagnosis. Subsequent pregnancy was achieved in ten patients. No uterine rupture was encountered during pregnancy or labor.

CONCLUSION: Ipsilateral salpingectomy, previous ectopic pregnancy, and in vitro fertilization are predisposing factors for interstitial pregnancy. Contrary to previous belief, rupture of interstitial pregnancy occurs relatively early in pregnancy. In selected patients, laparoscopic cornual excision is a viable treatment option.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
R. Faraj and M. Steel
Management of cornual (interstitial) pregnancy
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), October 1, 2007; 9(4): 249 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
P. Deruelle, J.-P. Lucot, C. Lions, and Y. Robert
Management of Interstitial Pregnancy Using Selective Uterine Artery Embolization
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2005; 106(5): 1165 - 1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.