Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;103:128-136
© 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, H.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Xirasagar, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, H.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Xirasagar, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow General obstetrics

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Institutional Factors in Cesarean Delivery Rates: Policy and Research Implications

Herng-Ching Lin, PhD and Sudha Xirasagar, MBBS, PhD

From the School of Health Care Administration, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; and Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Columbia, South Carolina.

Address reprint requests to: Herng-Ching Lin, School of Health Care Administration, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei 110, Taiwan; e-mail: henry11111{at}tmu.edu.tw.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of health care institutional characteristics with cesarean delivery.

METHODS: Cross-sectional data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance database was used, covering all 270,774 women admitted for singleton deliveries, in 2000. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used.

RESULTS: The overall cesarean rate was 32.3% of all deliveries. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics (with fewer than 10 beds) had a very high likelihood of cesarean delivery compared with all categories of hospitals (odds ratios 17–25), after adjusting for clinical complications and patient, physician, and institutional characteristics. The likelihood of cesarean delivery was similar across hospitals, regardless of level and ownership category. High cesarean propensity at clinics arose from higher cesarean rates in all complication categories, including "No complications." The overall hospital cesarean rate, 31.2%, is also higher than that in other developed countries with universal health care coverage.

CONCLUSION: Taiwan has very high cesarean rates, with a particularly high propensity for this procedure at clinics. The cesarean delivery profile in the various clinical complication categories suggests a significantly lower clinical threshold triggering cesarean delivery decisions in Taiwan, especially at obstetrics and gynecology clinics. Countries currently having or contemplating large expansions in health insurance coverage should document obstetric practice profiles before initiating coverage expansions. There is also a need for well designed research on the medical and life-satisfaction impacts of cesarean compared with vaginal delivery to enable an informed policy stand on this issue.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
S. Xirasagar, H.-C. Lin, and T.-C. Liu
Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan.
Health Policy Plan., July 1, 2006; 21(4): 319 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
H.-C. Lin, S. Xirasagar, and Y.-C. Tung
Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, June 1, 2006; 60(6): 522 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.