Obstetrics & Gynecology Email Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2003;102:1404-1409
© 2003 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neumayer, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neumayer, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, A.

REVIEWS

Imaging in Appendicitis: A Review With Special Emphasis on the Treatment of Women

Leigh Neumayer, MD, MS and Anne Kennedy, MD

From the Departments of Surgery and Radiology, Salt Lake City VA Healthcare System, and the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Address reprint requests to: Leigh Neumayer, MD, MS, Department of Surgery, 50 N Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132; E-mail: leigh.neumayer{at}hsc.utah.edu.

OBJECTIVE: Acute abdominal pain in women often presents the clinician with a diagnostic dilemma, especially if it is lower abdominal pain. Appendicitis is frequently entertained as a diagnosis, but until recently, the gold standard diagnostic procedure was operation, carrying a high false-negative rate. In recent years, computed tomographic (CT) scan has been advocated as a diagnostic aid. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy of CT scan in diagnosing appendicitis.

DATA SOURCES: Investigators searched PubMed between January and July 2003 using the terms "CT scan" and "appendicitis" with the limits "All adults 19+ years" and "English [language]." In addition, reference lists of all obtained articles were reviewed for other potential citations.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All prospective studies of adults published in English were considered.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Initial searches and reviews yielded 248 citations. Twenty-three of the citations reported prospective studies; only two of these were randomized studies. Prospective studies report sensitivities ranging from 77% to 100%, specificities ranging from 83% to 100%, and accuracies ranging from 88% to 98% for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Information gained from CT scans in patients with suspected appendicitis results in alternative diagnosis in 6% to 36%. These values are similar for both men and women.

CONCLUSION: The data support routine use of CT scan in both men and women for the diagnosis of appendicitis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. van Randen, S. Bipat, A. H. Zwinderman, D. T. Ubbink, J. Stoker, and M. A. Boermeester
Acute Appendicitis: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of CT and Graded Compression US Related to Prevalence of Disease
Radiology, August 5, 2008; (2008) 2483071652.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
K-H Lin, W-S Leung, C-P Wang, and W-K Chen
Cost analysis of management in acute appendicitis with CT scanning under a hospital global budgeting scheme
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 149 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. T. Rhea, E. F. Halpern, T. Ptak, J. N. Lawrason, R. Sacknoff, and R. A. Novelline
The Status of Appendiceal CT in an Urban Medical Center 5 Years After Its Introduction: Experience with 753 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1802 - 1808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
M. Edmonds
Review: the use of computed tomographic scanning has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults
Evid. Based Med., July 1, 2004; 9(4): 121 - 121.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.