|
|
||||||||
REVIEWS |
From the Departments of Surgery and Radiology, Salt Lake City VA Healthcare System, and the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Address reprint requests to: Leigh Neumayer, MD, MS, Department of Surgery, 50 N Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132; E-mail: leigh.neumayer{at}hsc.utah.edu.
OBJECTIVE: Acute abdominal pain in women often presents the clinician with a diagnostic dilemma, especially if it is lower abdominal pain. Appendicitis is frequently entertained as a diagnosis, but until recently, the gold standard diagnostic procedure was operation, carrying a high false-negative rate. In recent years, computed tomographic (CT) scan has been advocated as a diagnostic aid. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy of CT scan in diagnosing appendicitis.
DATA SOURCES: Investigators searched PubMed between January and July 2003 using the terms "CT scan" and "appendicitis" with the limits "All adults 19+ years" and "English [language]." In addition, reference lists of all obtained articles were reviewed for other potential citations.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All prospective studies of adults published in English were considered.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Initial searches and reviews yielded 248 citations. Twenty-three of the citations reported prospective studies; only two of these were randomized studies. Prospective studies report sensitivities ranging from 77% to 100%, specificities ranging from 83% to 100%, and accuracies ranging from 88% to 98% for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Information gained from CT scans in patients with suspected appendicitis results in alternative diagnosis in 6% to 36%. These values are similar for both men and women.
CONCLUSION: The data support routine use of CT scan in both men and women for the diagnosis of appendicitis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. van Randen, S. Bipat, A. H. Zwinderman, D. T. Ubbink, J. Stoker, and M. A. Boermeester Acute Appendicitis: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of CT and Graded Compression US Related to Prevalence of Disease Radiology, August 5, 2008; (2008) 2483071652. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K-H Lin, W-S Leung, C-P Wang, and W-K Chen Cost analysis of management in acute appendicitis with CT scanning under a hospital global budgeting scheme Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 149 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Rhea, E. F. Halpern, T. Ptak, J. N. Lawrason, R. Sacknoff, and R. A. Novelline The Status of Appendiceal CT in an Urban Medical Center 5 Years After Its Introduction: Experience with 753 Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1802 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Edmonds Review: the use of computed tomographic scanning has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults Evid. Based Med., July 1, 2004; 9(4): 121 - 121. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |